Modern History 2021 HSC Exam Predictions/Thoughts (1 Viewer)

[DarkOperator618]

bro that paper was hard af

 

[DarkOperator618]

what about the prominent individuals, i thought source e was kinda shit

yeh i did goring, hitler, goebells and himmler

i acc did hitler and the collective work of the officials

 

[uniqueusername1]

bro that paper was hard af

dw sir darkoperator IV

i know you sr it

 

[Hiheyhello]

territory is geography tho?

i linked geography to territory coz it emphasised the role of treaties ‘ending world war 1’ (i think lol)
so then i could link back to TOV and saint germaine

 

[iwanttodogoodinschool]

russia was bullshit but i did power struggle question - did not really know what they meant by leading Bolshevik figures but don't think I did too bad on that

arab-israeli questions would have been good if i studdieed more

power and authority was ez

civil rights was okay until last question, nessa fuckeed us with that

 

[DarkOperator618]

i linked geography to territory coz it emphasised the role of treaties ‘ending world war 1’ (i think lol)
so then i could link back to TOV and saint germaine

for that one i used versailles as an example cus that's the only one i knew lmao

related germany's issues with borders to its want for revenge in ww2

 

[Anaya R]

russia was bullshit but i did power struggle question - did not really know what they meant by leading Bolshevik figures but don't think I did too bad on that

arab-israeli questions would have been good if i studdieed more

power and authority was ez

civil rights was okay until last question, nessa fuckeed us with that

With that last q in civil rights, I talked about their role in voicing change, as well as the legislation, but said it was ultimately the grassroots (e.g. Bus Boycott) that brought success.

 

[Hiheyhello]

for that one i used versailles as an example cus that's the only one i knew lmao

related germany's issues with borders to its want for revenge in ww2

yeah i didn’t go to in depth coz it said outline
but at the start i mentioned how the treaties were made for the benefit of the superpowers.

tov
- lost polish corridor
lost alsace and lorraine

germaine
- divided austria and hungary

trianon
idk if it’s right but i said bulgaria had to give up a bunch of land and made up a stat

 

[DarkOperator618]

yeah i didn’t go to in depth coz it said outline
but at the start i mentioned how the treaties were made for the benefit of the superpowers.

tov
- lost polish corridor
lost alsace and lorraine

germaine
- divided austria and hungary

trianon
idk if it’s right but i said bulgaria had to give up a bunch of land and made up a stat

yea i only remembered tov

 

[Hiheyhello]

With that last q in civil rights, I talked about their role in voicing change, as well as the legislation, but said it was ultimately the grassroots (e.g. Bus Boycott) that brought success.

seeee that’s what im confused about
i wrote a paragraph evaluating each presidents role… and my teacher said that’s right….
but now im like, because it said ‘to what extent’ would you talk about other stuff (i did mention how activist groups were more effective but looked at presidents in detail)

 

[sophiatrnn]

russia was bullshit but i did power struggle question - did not really know what they meant by leading Bolshevik figures but don't think I did too bad on that

arab-israeli questions would have been good if i studdieed more

power and authority was ez

civil rights was okay until last question, nessa fuckeed us with that

last qbfor civil rights not too bad if u did CSSA trials paper, but i didnt but i just couldnt be bothered so many regrets

 

[DarkOperator618]

bro USA was acc easy

so was conflict

power and authority was a lil hard

apartheid (oh fuck me that was pain)

 

[Anaya R]

seeee that’s what im confused about
i wrote a paragraph evaluating each presidents role… and my teacher said that’s right….
but now im like, because it said ‘to what extent’ would you talk about other stuff (i did mention how activist groups were more effective but looked at presidents in detail)

Yeah.

 

[DarkOperator618]

also, do you lot think that modern is subjective like english? cus i keep hearing ppl talk about what they did and its vastly different to mine so idk

 

[Hiheyhello]

yeah im happy for power, wish i wrote more

happy for civil rights

happy with china

cold war: bro i was making up dates and shit and writing a bunch of incoherent jargon idek i hope my other sections save me

 

[Anaya R]

also, do you lot think that modern is subjective like english? cus i keep hearing ppl talk about what they did and its vastly different to mine so idk

They'll have marking guidelines and if you argue it well, then they will award you as necessary.
So i guess it's like English, but not really.

 

[DarkOperator618]

They'll have marking guidelines and if you argue it well, then they will award you as necessary.
So i guess it's like English, but not really.

oh FUCK yea

far out i didn't put a personality for the second one and said 'the collective work of the nazi officials' and leeched off the source and analysed the everlasting shit out of it

 

[Anaya R]

oh FUCK yea

far out i didn't put a personality for the second one and said 'the collective work of the nazi officials' and leeched off the source and analysed the everlasting shit out of it

I mean it said role of prominent individuals.
Obviously you need to talk about *individuals*, but if you mention factors you might just get a few marks off.

 

[DarkOperator618]

I mean it said role of prominent individuals.
Obviously you need to talk about *individuals*, but if you mention factors you might just get a few marks off.

i mean i said what the nazis did in upholding the ideology

i didn't say an individual for the second source, and nobody in my year did

i said hitler for the first and leeched off his speeches and how it affected the party's implementation of ideology

 

[Anaya R]

i mean i said what the nazis did in upholding the ideology

i didn't say an individual for the second source, and nobody in my year did

i said hitler for the first and leeched off his speeches and how it affected the party's implementation of ideology

Ok yeah that makes a bit more sense.
BTW does Hitler count as a prominent individual [in general]? I feel like he does, but the idea of that dot point is to acknowledge his support squad