I think its BEES. David Cohen is a geologist and Mike Archer is a a Palaentologist.redslert said:Not telling us what these lecturers teach is rude!
Woops, I meant the macromolecules guy, Mike Edwards I believe his name was. Make no mistake, Mike Archer rox everyone's metaphorical socks.stamos said:the fact that you've called mike archer 'fabulous and entertaining' and then 'horrifically boring' doesn't lend your list too much credibility
Peter Lam is awesome......... Ruddock........annoying yespolitik said:Best:
Richard Buckland comp1911
Good:
Peter Lam acct1501
Diane Mayorga acct1501
Annoying:
Caitlyn Ruddock acct1501
Indifferent:
Lesley Land infs1603
Claudia Gormly acct1501
Boring:
Andrew Taylor comp1911
Lol There is nothing really about 1st yr for the lecturers to get excited over, especially discrete.blackfriday said:what about jie du from pure mathematics? is he mr. charisma or what?
You and I spent every discrete lecture talking, doubt we actually took notice at anything Dr Du said.§eraphim said:Lol There is nothing really about 1st yr for the lecturers to get excited over, especially discrete.
Agreed totally, Ian was awesome, wish he taught the applied part of the course too I only missed one of Ian's lectures, with this new dude i've probably been to 2 lectures in total. He just reads off his pdf file.§eraphim said:Lol There is nothing really about 1st yr for the lecturers to get excited over, especially discrete.
You will find that Ian Doust, who lectures 1/2 of MATH2111 Higher Several Variable Calculus, is a very good lecturer. He manages to make concepts in Analysis interesting.
My solution: Don't do the courses more than once. Oh, and I only had him once in 1201 and that was a guest speaker role, but he was damn good at it, and seeing as the content related to the course, I included him. I wasn't aware that we had a series with him in second session (1101), but it's rather cool if we do.gress <3 tig said:Mike Archer, that guy who does BIOS1101 (or 1201? - the first year one that's in second session), his lectures are totally the same every year - same slides, same stories and same jokes, word for word..!!
If you have Wolgang for the second 1/2, it's not really his fault that the vector calculus stuff is dull. Wolfgang just skips a lot of steps in his proofs cz he's so damm smart. Wolgang also has the funny geek humour Physics t-shirts.acmilan said:Agreed totally, Ian was awesome, wish he taught the applied part of the course too I only missed one of Ian's lectures, with this new dude i've probably been to 2 lectures in total. He just reads off his pdf file.
Done, good luck. And thanks for helping me at the student science centret-i-m-m-y said:May as well pimp my election.
Any of you that are science students, or enrolled into a combined science program, please vote for myself (Timothy LI) and my friend, (Jacky HO). We are both running for Science Faculty Board.
http://www.webvote.unsw.edu.au
Thanks!
And about Mike Edwards, he is an okay lecturer. His lecture format is easy to follow, clear slides, and his exams aren't terribly difficult.