See rebuttal for 1st rebuttal.nikolas said:See 1st rebuttal
Secondly, i've stated time and time again, logics and reasoning cannot prove or disprove God.
See rebuttal for 1st rebuttal.nikolas said:See 1st rebuttal
Lol, i can tell you why specifically why they dont work... ie string theory is just math. But i wont be like writing out equations and stuff...zimmerman8k said:So you can't explain it.
But you are sure that it is correct and that it proves your argument?
Because it makes absolutely no sense?Tistime345 said:whats wrong with the middle part of my response Kwayera
I don't see how you make the conclusion the m-theory/multi-universe completely rule out naturalistic explanations. I have read, and re-read Chan737's op, he simply does not prove naturalistic explanations are insufficient. He merely asserts it.Lukybear said:See rebuttal for 1st rebuttal.
We already know this.Lukybear said:Secondly, i've stated time and time again, logics and reasoning cannot prove or disprove God.
Lie down before you hurt yourself.Tistime345 said:And the little bitch, the one who got no friends John Oliver, when was my physics ever refuted cunt, care to argue, when did i admit that in this post or was the senior stuff just too hard to really get. Get the fuk off to bed you little fuk, before your parents belt teh shit out of you.
In that one you quoted i was just acknowledging that i got nothing agianst nikolas for trying
Well actually the energy provided was most likely from deep ocean vents. Not lightning.Tistime345 said:kwayera read your allies post, john oliver,
If diluted throughout early Earth's ocean, it probably wouldn't do much to stimulate the emergence of life.
deep ocean theory =dumb bitch, + hows lightning meant to get down to the deep ocean
And john oliver, mr genius, your quoting that doesnt really apply, amino acids dont just link together, present or not, without some external source of energy, lightning? wouldnt that have destroyed the amino acids were trying to get to link together
mate, i tried being reasonable with you, but, stfu, you're a joke.Tistime345 said:ooh, third year uni, im terrified, so your views now conflict, one is required for the correct elements to be present, i.e the asteroid, the other is required for the oxygen to be present, i.e. deep ocean. Here i'll give you both a hint, they conflict because it never really happened
Tistime345 said:Your argument, Oxygen was present in the deep ocean even though none existed in the atmosphere,
Obvious to anyone whos done yr12, oxygen in the deep ocean is from the deep ocean currents that take it down from the surface,
Reality- if there was no oxygen in the atmosphere then tehres no disperison into te surface, i.e. theres no dispersion further down into the ocean.
Now your ranting about being superior seems a bit embarrasing doesnt it
You do realise that the Urey-Miller experiment was just proof of concept? It wasn't meant to describe that it was EXACTLY how it happened, only that it was possible. Which is what I meant when I said the likely source of energy was hydrothermal vents, not lightning.Tistime345 said:and john oliver i was talking to kwayera with that last comment, for yours though ill comment now, aright even conceding if the lightning created ions which led to lightning, how was that lightning not meant to desroy the amino acids into their constituents when it struck. You know theres a reaosn in the urey miller experiemnt that they didnt let the gases pass through the reaction chamber twice, casue excatly what i said would have happened, those same amino acids formed would have been destroyed. The fact of the matter is they are simply not gonna get to proteins
uh do you see how you guys are fighting tw separate arguments, sometimes john says that it hapened in shallow surface pools and then other times you go into your deep ocean vent theory, btw, how was ammonia meant to get into the reacton site before forming ammonium, ill give you a hint, it cant unless the wate was already saturated with it, and it was not.Kwayera said:You do realise that the Urey-Miller experiment was just proof of concept? It wasn't meant to describe that it was EXACTLY how it happened, only that it was possible. Which is what I meant when I said the likely source of energy was hydrothermal vents, not lightning.
kwayera your such a dope, are you telling me then that the anaerobic bacteria that formed in the ocean, somehow got into the mud and survived there, didnt you know that at those levels the ocean has close to 100ppm of oxygen , the fact that the dirt is mud suggests water is in it, i.e. the same oxygen rich water all around itKwayera said:You're really stupid.
Sediment and mud, my friend.