hermand
je t'aime.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,432
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2009
yeah, as someone said before, it seems like it's a really negative system for the high achievers, trying to make the crap people feel good about themselves but forgetting about the people who actually kick ass.but the uai was never a percentage, it was a PERCENTILE =]
meaning, if u say a uai of 100 is a perfect score (here the criteria being that noone beat u!)
that will still apply to the atar, with 99.95 now being the 'perfect'
how wrong am i??
what im very confused with is why this atar thing seems to favour 'lower' achievers??? for eg: the uac table says that a 60 uai is a 64 point something atar while a 99 uai only jumps up by 0.05...
eh.