Module B - All Texts (1 Viewer)

sar567

Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
35
Did any1 else do in the skin of a lion? If so did u just use the readings to say tht it would always have relivance to som1 therefore not hav a used by date? caus thts all i could think to do
 

Nezz

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
104
Location
Coast
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
for cloudstreet i said that a text that has textual integrity doesnt have a use-by date and then just proved that cloudstreet has textual integrity cause of themes, language, characterisation etc...
i thnk i sorta babbled a little though...
 

yenta

veyron <3
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
1,151
Location
parramatta stadium
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
Originally posted by swangal
ahaha. i did the exact same poems, with the same arguments + chucked in a few critics statements. That question was easily the best one of the 3.
Lol, yeah I agree, I did that question first cos as soon as I read it I knew I could just crap on about it
 

yenta

veyron <3
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
1,151
Location
parramatta stadium
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
Originally posted by Vana
hmm..
i agreed with the statement..is that wrong??
Doesn't matter whether u agree or disagree with the statement...if u can give a strong argument and back it up with quotes and examples and hence prove that the statement is true/untrue, thats what will get u the marks
 

Kiya

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
73
OMG I did SKIN OF A LION and the question didnt relate to the text at all!! annoyed me so much!!
 

cakes

hi
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
301
Location
sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
Originally posted by sar567
Did any1 else do in the skin of a lion? If so did u just use the readings to say tht it would always have relivance to som1 therefore not hav a used by date? caus thts all i could think to do
I do skin of a lion, it was a weird question for the text because it's so "new", and my readings are both contemporary, being postmodern and post-colonial, thus it was hard to say that there was no use-by date. but i just did the readings, and said that, meaning is made when there is a negotiation between composer and responder, so it isn't intrinsic, but an interpretation based on the reader's context, thus will always be different, hence there is no use-by date. something like that.. it was hard, since my readings didn't exactly back up the statement
 

LeesY

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
29
Location
the western area
john donne was an easy question but wasnt it a matter of either agreeing or disagreeing with the statement? well i structured my response similar to that of a debate and i held negative sides to the question
didnt write much for it though 6.5 pages i think...in the 20 minutes i had left
english needs more time!!!
 

sugamama

Coldplay Fan
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
239
Yeah I think most people disagreed with the statement. I just justified it because it can read in diff ways (marx/fem) and critics had celebrated/criticised his poetry (dryden/johnson/grierson/eliot)
 

Toodulu

werd!
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
1,335
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
yea i disagreed. erm i did johnson's reading of sunne rising and stevie davies (a feminist) reading of batter my heart. and i said that it was their contexts that shaped their meaning, and that because donne's poetry was dealing with an intellectual argument, it's still relevant, and can be interpreted in a multitude of approaches conditioned by the reader's social/cultural context, thus it cannot expire its used by date.
or something.
 

Taz

ThankGodItsNotStill2003
Joined
Feb 28, 2003
Messages
57
Location
In front of my computer!
How many other people did plath???
I thought the Plath question sucked - although i've never likes Plath stuff. I completely screwed it, only wrote 3 pages.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top