• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Mathematical Curiosities. (1 Viewer)

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Hi everybody!

When I was a student, I often had a lot of 'theory questions' that often could not be answered by my teacher, and I often wished that I had some sort of place where I could ask such questions.

Examples of such questions are:

In Auxiliary Angle method, why do we always take R>0? Why don't we take R<0?
I read in one textbook that the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra asserts that every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. But another textbook says that the FTA means that a polynomial of degree N has N roots. Aren't these two completely different statements?
I know for sure that if I were a student, I would have loved for such a thing, so feel free to ask whatever 'curiosities' you have here! We have a plethora of users here who are able to answer them.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
Why does the Board write progressively easier MX2 papers? This has always been a curiosity for me...
 

panda15

Alligator Navigator
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
675
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Why did the Board of Studies bring in multiple choice for higher level maths?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Why did the Board of Studies bring in multiple choice for higher level maths?
Cheaper and easier to mark.

Also, a nice way to examine those 'small topics' without having to allocate 2-3 marks for them, otherwise it would be difficult to fit everything into 100 marks.
 
Last edited:

rumbleroar

Survivor of the HSC
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
2,271
Gender
Female
HSC
2014
Just out of curiosity, which 4U topics are the "hardest" in your opinion? And which ones would I need to work hardest on? I know its different and relative for all people, but I want to get a range of opinions just to see what I'm facing for the next year.
 

bottleofyarn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
50
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Just out of curiosity, which 4U topics are the "hardest" in your opinion? And which ones would I need to work hardest on? I know its different and relative for all people, but I want to get a range of opinions just to see what I'm facing for the next year.
I'd go with harder 3U though polys can get really tricky (see past HSC q15/16s).

Does the auxilary angle for R<0 have a different angle theta or something which reduces down through odd/even/trig properties to give the same answer?

Question: how do you find the volume of a solid if the curve is being rotated on an oblique line?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
I'd go with harder 3U though polys can get really tricky (see past HSC q15/16s).

Does the auxilary angle for R<0 have a different angle theta or something which reduces down through odd/even/trig properties to give the same answer?

Question: how do you find the volume of a solid if the curve is being rotated on an oblique line?
1. Yeah, shift alpha by pi to get between a negative and positive R. Everything will work out the same of course. Formulae just look nicer with the convention of taking R > 0 I guess.

2. Within MX2 methods, you can use the perpendicular distance formula to find the volume of the infinitesimal annuli/cylindrical shells which sweep out your solid. (Pretty sure a question of this type worked out in a similar way is an example in the Cambridge book.)

Alternatively you could use MX2 knowledge of complex numbers to rotate your curve in the plane so that your "oblique line" is now horizontal. Then do the usual volumes stuff.
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
How is this possible:






Skip to 5:34

Is this possible, or is the guy talking just saying random bullcrap?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
2,225
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2012
How is this possible:






Skip to 5:34

Is this possible, or is the guy talking just saying random bullcrap?
Pretty sure its a troll?

Suppose j=a+ib for b nonzero and real, since j is not real.

J^2= a^2-b^2+2abi =1.

Collecting real and imaginary parts, a^2-b^2=1 and ab=0. Since b non zero, a must be 0. Thus -b^2 =1 so b^2=-1 which is not possible since b was assumed to be real. Thus no real b can make the equality true.
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Pretty sure its a troll?

Suppose j=a+ib for b nonzero and real, since j is not real.

J^2= a^2-b^2+2abi =1.

Collecting real and imaginary parts, a^2-b^2=1 and ab=0. Since b non zero, a must be 0. Thus -b^2 =1 so b^2=-1 which is not possible since b was assumed to be real. Thus no real b can make the equality true.
That proof looks valid, but what does it mean exactly?
 

obliviousninja

(╯°□°)╯━︵ ┻━┻ - - - -
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
6,624
Location
Sydney Girls
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2017
Why is mechanics beginning to be phased out, as someone said in the forums a while back?
 

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Why is mechanics beginning to be phased out, as someone said in the forums a while back?
What you mean in terms of HSC exams?
Or in terms of Engineering/Science?

You do know that there is more to mechanics than the 4U version?
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
That proof looks valid, but what does it mean exactly?
The proof means that 1 has no non-real complex square roots. Similarly we can show that 1 has no non-real quaternion square roots.

If we take the word "extended number" to loosely mean any extension of the complex numbers which still obeys all the nice properties of the real and complex numbers (formally, we require that we are at least an integral domain), then we can show that a number has at most two square roots.
Hence 1 has no non-real square roots in any such "extended" number system.

Of course if we allow extensions of the complex numbers that are less nice, then 1 can have many square roots. (For example, the matrix diag(1,-1) is a non-real square root of 1 in the ring of 2x2 matrices over the real numbers).
 
Last edited:

anomalousdecay

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,766
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Of course if we allow extensions of the complex numbers that are less nice, then 1 can have many square roots. (For example, the matrix diag(1,-1) is a non-real square root of 1 in the ring of 2x2 matrices over the real numbers).
So are you saying that it is not possible for j in the form a+ib ?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top