HSC Papers- marks. (2 Viewers)

lychnobity

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
1,292
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
Cheers for the insight.

The quicker method, surely you're referring to the substitution method?
It's the "mental method" - a hybrid of the substitution and equating the coefficients (when necessary)

Say you have

Sub in x=2 to . Get this number and write it on top of x-2

Sub x=-4 to , write on top of x+4

So in partial fractions:



If the question contains repeated linear factors, like this:

Sub in x=2 to . Get this number and write it on top of (x-2)2

Sub x=-4 to , write on top of x+4

Now for the number on top of (x-2) I equate the coefficients of x2



So in partial fractions:



i think he is reffering to the "supa cool method"

suppose:

5x = a(x-2) + b(x)
what you can do is,
let x = 0
thus you can solve for a straightaway
then for b
you let x = 2
which will make a = 0 and you can get b straightaway again.

if you call this substitution method, then you are not doing this method justice.
get it right and call it "supa cool method".
Sometimes I use this, but usually the above.


Looking at your subject marks, I reckon that as long as your English is up there, you may actually get 99.95. Infact, you remind me of Laurie Fields. :p
funny that you mentioned that, I thought the exact same thing
 

kwabon

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
646
Location
right behind you, mate
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
It's the "mental method" - a hybrid of the substitution and equating the coefficients (when necessary)

Say you have

Sub in x=2 to . Get this number and write it on top of x-2

Sub x=-4 to , write on top of x+4

So in partial fractions:



If the question contains repeated linear factors, like this:

Sub in x=2 to . Get this number and write it on top of (x-2)2

Sub x=-4 to , write on top of x+4

Now for the number on top of (x-2) I equate the coefficients of x2



So in partial fractions:
its a pretty cool way, but if you were to think about it, you are just using the "supa cool method" but just skipping a whole lot of working out lines. which makes your method quicker.

i shall give you a few names to name your method, you obviously have the honour of choosing them;

supa cool method 2.0
supa cool method 2
supa lynch method
method of death
supa fast method
awesomeness
VERY NICE
and finally my favourite
partial fraction in 10 seconds.

(y)

EDIT: i see you already have given a name. :-(
 
Last edited:

H4rdc0r3

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
118
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
what the fuck!@#$@%@

what raw mark should i be aiming to get 93-94 overall?
 

-Onlooker-

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
150
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
its a pretty cool way, but if you were to think about it, you are just using the "supa cool method" but just skipping a whole lot of working out lines. which makes your method quicker.

i shall give you a few names to name your method, you obviously have the honour of choosing them;

supa cool method 2.0
supa cool method 2
supa lynch method
method of death
supa fast method
awesomeness
VERY NICE
and finally my favourite
partial fraction in 10 seconds.

(y)

EDIT: i see you already have given a name. :-(
Interesting
 

shaon0

...
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
2,029
Location
Guess
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Well as you already know, Hugh Parsonage got 87/120 which equated to 93 HSC marks. Hopefully that gives you an idea.

Anyway, back on topic - 2004: 92/120
Oh ok. Seems reliable then. btw, got 108/120 for SGS 06, lost most of my marks on Q2 and the circle geo :(
 

jackc91

rumpleshit
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
98
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Did anybody else find the 05 paper fairly difficult?

I managed 81/120. :(
 

yibbon

Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
35
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
2006: 93/120

Marked it very strictly, however being easy on the errors my mark would have been 99/120.
 

shaon0

...
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
2,029
Location
Guess
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Just did HSC 1999 and got 114/120 but i found the probability to be hard and the last part of the circle geo.
 

redfield

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
50
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
i did 2006 last night and got 71%-would that be E4 orE3
Definately an E4. Anything over 70% is an E4. I'm pretty sure the person who sets the band cut-offs each yr for 4u sets them quite low (usually in the 60%s). I think last yr's paper was fairly difficult though, cause I know a few guys who got E4s and they reckoned they got 71-75/120. But anyway, yes, 71% would be an E4.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top