• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

How hard is Actuarial Studies (2 Viewers)

MAICHI

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
146
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
nli86 said:
For all you guys doing acturial studies who did well in 4u maths, did u ppl go to coaching or tutoring and did it help you in 4u?. What happens when in actuarial studies your only resource is the lectuer and from what some ppl have said they teach only enough for you to pass.
If you can actually understand the lecturers you should get full marks. No one ever understand anything in lectures, they go way too fast for the average joe.
 

I Robot

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Just a quick question to people who have already done ACTL1001...

Does the Actuarial Studies department (ie, Bindya) supply a copy of the formula book during the final examination?
It's just that I'm not committed at the present time of enduring 3-4 years of ACTL courses just yet, let along forking out a $77 book where you can photocopy it for less than $5.

Thanks in advance,
 

redslert

yes, my actual brain
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,373
Location
Behind You!!
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
in the final exam you are only allowed one book to take into the exam, the formula book
no statistical datasheets nor formulae will be provided
you will need to bring your OWN.

photocopies will NOT be allowed
 

t-i-m-m-y

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Messages
1,756
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Yep. The formula book is your lifeblood in the exam, unless of course, you decide to memorise all the necessary formulae and statistical data. Photocoipes are NOT allowed. Please remember that your formula book is 'wholly unannotated'.

I, Robot. I suggest you borrow a copy of the formula book, either from a friend or the library(I think the library has copies, albeit old editions which are the same anyway).
 

danza108

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Messages
43
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Do you if many guys doing Acturial are on Co-op scholarships? And if so, they did get the high uais or did they look at people who were well rounded, etc? And is there a set level you need to perform at, to maintain your Co-op scholarship? Also Secondly, are Co-Ops based on actual UAIs or just ones which are predicted by the school?

Thanks
 
Last edited:

seremify007

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Messages
10,059
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2009
I haven't got an actuary scholarship nor am I interested- but I thought I'd say scholarships tend to go to people who are more well rounded, and IMO, are good for the uni/sponsors- ie. they are employable.
 

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
nli86 said:
For all you guys doing acturial studies who did well in 4u maths, did u ppl go to coaching or tutoring and did it help you in 4u?. What happens when in actuarial studies your only resource is the lectuer and from what some ppl have said they teach only enough for you to pass.
The best approach is to get out of the mindset that one has to be taught by someone else in order to learn.
 

ngai

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
223
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
to 2nd+ yr students:
what is the min mark that u think we should require in ACTL1001 to be able to manage the actl subjects in the future?
i know they set the benchmark at a credit, but for example, would someone who just gets exactly 65 be able to do reasonably well in later years?
 

t-i-m-m-y

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Messages
1,756
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I'd say 75+ in ACTL1001 to do reasonably well in later years. If you get a credit, you will still be able to manage 2nd year ACTL subjects, but you might be struggling. And I guess it depends on what you mean by 'reasonably well'.

If you gain the following grades in ACTL1001:

Pass- you should have some serious thoughts about whether you want to continue.

Credit- you should consider if you are willing to put a lot of work into further 2nd year subjects. Ask yourself if you think you were capable of doing better in ACTL1001.

Distinction- you'll be okay in 2nd yr, but again, you'll need to work hard.

High Distinction- congrats! You'll be fine, but don't slack off.

Take ACTL1001 as the benchmark for further studies. If you did your best in ACTL1001 and didn't do too well, perhaps you should considering dropping out. If you are not prepared to work harder over the next few years, maybe actuarial isn't for you.

ACTL1001 filters out those who don't want to work hard, and those who simply aren't capable of handling the actuarial courses. Yes, ACTL1001 is hard, but it stops people from wasting their own time in future years, as well as for Sachi to have a little bit of fun torturing us.

But hey, exams haven't even come - so for now, study hard.
 

lawforever

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
219
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
ngai said:
to 2nd+ yr students:
what is the min mark that u think we should require in ACTL1001 to be able to manage the actl subjects in the future?
i know they set the benchmark at a credit, but for example, would someone who just gets exactly 65 be able to do reasonably well in later years?

my personal point of view is ACTL1001 is not a closely related course to the further actl subjects. There is always some exception, but averagely speaking, try to get a credit or higher. pass is still fine, just need to work harder next year.
 

lawforever

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
219
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Affinity said:
The best approach is to get out of the mindset that one has to be taught by someone else in order to learn.
that approach doesn't seem to be applicable to most of the people. :)

If i dun get taught by the lecturers, I then get taught by you.
 

t-i-m-m-y

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Messages
1,756
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
lawforever said:
my personal point of view is ACTL1001 is not a closely related course to the further actl subjects. There is always some exception, but averagely speaking, try to get a credit or higher. pass is still fine, just need to work harder next year.
I disagree. It provides an introduction to the rest of the actuarial courses - in terms of content(somewhat). It serves to warn students that they must be prepared to work hard in order to survive, let alone do well, in further actuarial subjects.

And here's some consolation to those struggling, it's not necessary to understand the material as it is being taught in the lectures, it hardly ever makes sense. Just be prepared to study it yourself, by reading the textbook and doing the tutorial questions.
 

lawforever

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
219
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
t-i-m-m-y said:
I disagree. It provides an introduction to the rest of the actuarial courses - in terms of content(somewhat). It serves to warn students that they must be prepared to work hard in order to survive, let alone do well, in further actuarial subjects.

And here's some consolation to those struggling, it's not necessary to understand the material as it is being taught in the lectures, it hardly ever makes sense. Just be prepared to study it yourself, by reading the textbook and doing the tutorial questions.
I admit it has a brief introduction to all the actuarial courses. But the point is, this course isn't connecting to 2nd yr courses too well. There are 2 reasons here: 1. you don't have to do 1001 before you do 2001/2002.

2. The content of 1001 shows that there is a big difference in terms of level of difficulty between tut work and assessments. Also according to the purpose of education, uni needs to encourage and assist student to learn and apply what has been learnt. It shouldn't be a place to discourage students by scaring or warning them. And what we observed has certainly deviated away from this purpose.

Overall, actuarial is a course desgined by human and learned by human too. If it s hard then it should be same hard for all ACTLs or gradually being harder in later years. If one decides to do it, he will experience the difficulty as time goes. But the reality is the introductory course has been deliberately made to be harder than the later year courses so lota students withdraw in their 1st year. I doubt that this is the case in Macquarie.
 

flyin'

EDIT
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
6,677
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Supra, the sort-of equivalent is ACST151.

lawforever said:
But the reality is the introductory course has been deliberately made to be harder than the later year courses so lota students withdraw in their 1st year. I doubt that this is the case in Macquarie.
At Macquarie, people don't quit so easily. Even if they have to repeatedly do the same units over and over again (even when they've passed them). Oh, and ACST151 (Intro to Actuarial Studies) in first semester is scary!
 

MAICHI

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
146
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
lawforever said:
Overall, actuarial is a course desgined by human and learned by human too. If it s hard then it should be same hard for all ACTLs or gradually being harder in later years. If one decides to do it, he will experience the difficulty as time goes. But the reality is the introductory course has been deliberately made to be harder than the later year courses so lota students withdraw in their 1st year. I doubt that this is the case in Macquarie.
So you are saying that actl200x subjects give out higher marks than actl1001?
 

lawforever

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
219
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
MAICHI said:
So you are saying that actl200x subjects give out higher marks than actl1001?
i m not sure abt the mark distribution. But if you study properly (attend lecture, do assignment yourself, do all the tut work), you should be able to kill 200X.
And this obviously is not the case for 1001
 

I Robot

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
34
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
MAICHI, I believe lawforever could be referring to the lecturer-in-charge of ACTL1001...Sachi... (*shudders*) He has made ACTL1001 a living hell at the moment and I'm pretty sure the other lecturers in ACTL2001-2003 aren't as daunting as him (hopefully, that is he doesn't teach 2nd year).

I would agree with lawforever in regard to ACTL1001; as Sachi said in our first lecture, this subject covers snippets of the entire actuarial profession taught in ACTL3001-3004.

And thanks to T-i-m-m-y about the formula book issue...didn't need it in Test 2, but probably in final exam.
 

MAICHI

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2005
Messages
146
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
lawforever said:
i m not sure abt the mark distribution. But if you study properly (attend lecture, do assignment yourself, do all the tut work), you should be able to kill 200X. And this obviously is not the case for 1001
Ok, so from your exprience is that you studied hard for actl1001, but still, you didn't get the mark you'd expect for the work put in, contrarily you got a good mark for actl200X by doing the same amount of work?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top