FTO or SUPRA? (1 Viewer)

[Dingo2004]

both des cars look kinda da same from all angles
same shape dat is

dey also cost around da same price..

which one should i get?

someone tell me the Cons and Pros for each of des cars
i dunno shit about cars

peace^^

 

[Ziff]

Get a $300 Nissan Skyline instead

 

[Dingo2004]

i dont like skyline
its too long

 

[Newbie]

i prefer a van or a ute

 

[cyrax83]

supra looks alot better and has better looking body kits no doubt (veilside ofcourse). although you can get emn on fto's, personal preference for me it looks alot better on supra's.

FTO is a 6 cylinder petrol injected 2L
Supra is a 6 cylinder petrol injected 3L

if your not getting a manual dont bother getting a sports car and if you dont know manual learn it, its not that hard once you get the hang of it.

and i know supra's dash archs towards the driver which looks hot not sure if the FTO has this style or not. Supra i reckon has a better name than the FTO too, probably because more people know what a supra is rather than a fto.

All in all i guess its just personal preference. I'm sure there are cons for supra's but i'm probably being biased here.

there are cosmetic differences between the cars also, FTO has a huge ass compared to the supra.

 

[santaslayer]

I would choose supra over FTO coz i dunno what a FTO is!
But dingo, ur only gonna be able to afford one after u fulfill ur lifelong dream of a managing role in the sex industry!

 

[Dingo2004]

santaclause
its not dat expensive
lol
i can get a non turbo 1994 supra for less than 20k
and also an FTO for just over 10k

 

[redslert]

FTO is crap
as if you can compare a FTO to a supra

 

[cyrax83]

yep, supra all the way

 

[sugaryblue]

Honda Integra is better?

 

[AsyLum]

Supra!!! TT

MkIV!!

*drools*

 

[breaking]

yep supra over an fto any day

 

[j-belle]

Originally posted by Dingo2004
both des cars look kinda da same from all angles
same shape dat is

dey also cost around da same price..

which one should i get?

someone tell me the Cons and Pros for each of des cars
i dunno shit about cars

In short,
Supras look tough, and even the non-turbos are very fast.
FTOs don't look tough (in Japan, I'd say they're mostly owned by females), and are about as fast as a mistubishi lancer or a ford laser.

The only way in which the FTO is better is fuel economy, but they're both non-turbo 6's, so the difference wouldn't be that big, and that the Supra is pretty heavy.

I know what I'd choose

Originally posted by sugaryblue
Honda Integra is better?

lol was this a joke?

 

[babygirrl **HoOchie**]

LAMBORGHINI!!!

 

[RUB!X]

supra for sure, thats not really a comparison, hmmm ...

 

[cyrax83]

Originally posted by babygirrl **HoOchie**
LAMBORGHINI!!!

if you've got a couple of hundred K to burn

 

[ToO LaZy ^*]

now here's my kinda car!...

 

[Dingo2004]

LOL SO YOU ALL LIKE THE SUPRA BETTER??

FUCKEN OATH
I LIKE THE FTO BETTER....

SHIT SHIT SHIT

BUT IF I BUY AN FTO.. IM GONNA PUT A VIELSIDE BODYKIT ON IT.
OR A C-WEST .. WHICHEVER..

THAT WOULD LOOK BETTER THAN A STANDARD SUPRA N E DAY

COZ MOST OF MY FRIENDS HAVE A STANDARD SUPRA
SO MY FTO WITH A MAD ASS BODYKIT WILL OUTSHINE IT..

MUEAHAHEAEHAEH

 

[redslert]

so you go for rice....shame

yeh go buy the fto

don't get upset later when you can't keep up with the traffic

 

[AsyLum]

Originally posted by redslert
so you go for rice....shame

yeh go buy the fto

don't get upset later when you can't keep up with the traffic

muhahahahhaha


tis true,
supra = power
fto = rice