• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Do we need to memorise this identity? (2 Viewers)

SammyT123

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
360
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Thanks paradoxica

I personally prefer the trig substitution

But jeez that method is also very quick :D
 

SammyT123

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
360
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Are the t-formula results ever 'unavoidable'

(I know that theoretically they are obviously unavoidable, but sitting in the middle of a 4U hsc exam is it still feasible to avoid them?)
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Are the t-formula results ever 'unavoidable'

(I know that theoretically they are obviously unavoidable, but sitting in the middle of a 4U hsc exam is it still feasible to avoid them?)
Something like this is just dodge

 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Also one of the things to keep in mind for the tangent half angle substitution is that you have to take care when integrating across a singularity....

Because that can give different results if you ignore the singularity versus you splitting and taking limits.
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Something like this is just dodge

Also

1. Yuck. The numbers aren't even nice. Would have been lovely to have 3sinx + 4cosx but nooooooooo you didn't give me a correctly ordered pythagorean triple

2. t-formula is messy answer anyway, since it involves a fair bit of surds

3. *flies away*
 

SammyT123

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
360
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Also

1. Yuck. The numbers aren't even nice. Would have been lovely to have 3sinx + 4cosx but nooooooooo you didn't give me a correctly ordered pythagorean triple

2. t-formula is messy answer anyway, since it involves a fair bit of surds

3. *flies away*
Went in balls deep
Didn't seem too bad unless I screwed up completely LOL
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Went in balls deep
Didn't seem too bad unless I screwed up completely LOL
I had √2, √3 appear in the answer.

If I see more than one non-square number under a square root, I will immediately back out and look to see if there is a better path to the answer.

Otherwise, proceed through the flames of hell.
 

SammyT123

Active Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2014
Messages
360
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
I had √2, √3 appear in the answer.

If I see more than one non-square number under a square root, I will immediately back out and look to see if there is a better path to the answer.

Otherwise, proceed through the flames of hell.


What did I do wrong this time
Rip
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,252
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I recall doing a similar integral a few days ago, from Bob Aus's book.

Using the usual t-formulae:


 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
I recall doing a similar integral a few days ago, from Bob Aus's book.

Using the usual t-formulae:


The Auxiliary Transformation and the Tangent Half Angle Substitution will be guaranteed to be nice for (asinx + bcosx + c)-1 IFF (a,b,c) is a Pythagorean Triple.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,252
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The Auxiliary Transformation and the Tangent Half Angle Substitution will be guaranteed to be nice for (asinx + bcosx + c)-1 IFF (a,b,c) is a Pythagorean Triple.
That's interesting. I have not investigated, but I noticed that in both integrals, {3,4,5} and {5,12,13} are Pythagorean Triples.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top