Aeonium
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2022
- Messages
- 640
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
blonde people who drink chatime/sharetea brown sugar pearl milk teawhat a scattered series of opinions. wasians? lgbt? vinnies? epstein? keep talking
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
blonde people who drink chatime/sharetea brown sugar pearl milk teawhat a scattered series of opinions. wasians? lgbt? vinnies? epstein? keep talking
omg @SylviaB she said smth about blonde ppl. attack!!blonde people who drink chatime/sharetea brown sugar pearl milk tea
Shooting a rifle and hitting a target through a scope at a distance is something for which you would require training/experience (not to mention the pressure associated with killing someone in a crowd of people). Not an easy thing to do by any stretch.i never took kirk's opinions or takes seriously and kind of interpreted them as ragebait/idiocy, didn't expect this to happen tbh
that aside you're telling me the trump assasin missed THREE shots and this guy shot kirk clear in the neck? ok
As I said before, his team did so well to stage manage him with sub-par opponents and perfect sound bites - he looked like a way better debater then what he was in reality. The very few times he came up against people with the right knowledge he didn't come off looking so great.particularly kirk's abortion arguments against people who actually know what they're talking about -- and the fact that his primary opponents are college students. i'm not going to waste my time watching these debates because there are way better things to do with your time than watch a 30 year old argue with uni 1st years
oh and his whole epstein file opinion shifting as soon as trump was elected – whatever,
i was also very apathetic towards whatever came out of kirk (or really, any political influencer on social media) – however, other people are not and i think media with kirk would be perfect ragebait just as media with mamdani from nyc is a ragebait towards uneducated boomers in NYCYou getting butthurt over people disagreeing with you isn't what 'rage bait' means
don't say that about the masterdebaterhe looked like a way better debater then what he was in reality.
Legit the amount of times Ive heard senior public servants specifically apply the "How will this look on the front page of the Telegraph/Australian" is ridiculous. Imagine being subject matter experts and having to gauge whether policy/government action is a good idea based on overtly biased rage-bait journalism is insane. Completely kills good public policy.the world is just a cycle of perpetual ragebait
South Park reference - respect.don't say that about the masterdebater![]()
someone's got nothing in their mindsomeones got ragebait on their mind
so if you think defunding the police and paying to fly in anyone from across the US and give them gender surgery isn't good policy, you're "uneducated"?i was also very apathetic towards whatever came out of kirk (or really, any political influencer on social media) – however, other people are not and i think media with kirk would be perfect ragebait just as media with mamdani from nyc is a ragebait towards uneducated boomers in NYC
the world is just a cycle of perpetual ragebait
Care to provide an example?As I said before, his team did so well to stage manage him with sub-par opponents and perfect sound bites - he looked like a way better debater then what he was in reality. The very few times he came up against people with the right knowledge he didn't come off looking so great.
It's amazing how quickly you try and change the subject when ever you're proven wrongSylvia are you not the one that specifically said it is not gun violence, it is a political assassination? So like you were all "that's not what we are discussing" but now you're all "That is what we are discussing"
girl hasnt seen the cambridge yt shortsCare to provide an example?
I did not demand proof that gun violence is not the same as political shootings.It's amazing how quickly you try and change the subject when ever you're proven wrong
And my argument is that 'gun violence' generally is different to political shootings specifically, so trying to "fix" the former wouldn't necessarily reduce the latter. Then you demanded proof that they're different and I provided it. It's amazing how you literally can't keep track of an argument from one post to the next.
you know that mamdani literally supports what I said, right? It's actually that crazy, im not engaging in hyperbole hereyall, if you don't agree with state-mandated gender reassignment surgery at birth, you r are nazi and there's no educating you.
You just didyou know that mamdani literally supports what I said, right? It's actually that crazy, im not engaging in hyperbole here
I said gun violence in the US is mostly black people shooting each other and you disagreed. And obviously, reducing the rate at which black people shoot each other doesn't necessarily reduce the chance that a political activist gets murdered.I did not demand proof that gun violence is not the same as political shootings.