Biochemistry/Microbiology Challenge Question. (1 Viewer)

Survivor39

Premium Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
4,467
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Budz said:
I am also only guessing but isnt it because it is only toxic to bacteriums. You could also ask why some antibiotices affect certain species of bacteria and other dont.
But why is it only toxic to bacteria??


Budz said:
I was always under the impression that some fungi secrete chemicals which were found to inhibit bacterial growth. After the testing upon various organisms it was concluded that only certain species of bacteria was affected by certain antibiotics.
Yes, fungi do secrete chemicals which inhibit bacterial growth. That was how penicillin was discovered. But how, that it only inhibit bacterial cells, not human cells??


Budz said:
If no well my next best guess would be somethign to do with bacterium's lack of a nucleus. lol.
No

Budz said:
And if not then i guess the antigens (chemical signature) of certain bacteria allow for attraction of ceratin antibiotics
Not really.

The answer is that antibiotic attack bacteria mainly because of their cell walls, and their ribosomes.

Human cells do not consist a thick layer of cell walls. Bacteria do. Certain antibiotics target the cell walls because of their unique chemical structure. The bacterial cell wall is composed of layers of peptidoglycans, which crosslinks with each other via a chain amino acids. Therefore, antibiotics can:
Target peptidoglycan chain, OR
Target the crosslinks between the peptidoglycan, that is the amino acids.

But you might ask, why do antibiotics only target amino acids on bacteria? That is because we, humans have 20 amino acids, and bacteria have more than 20. Antibiotics target bacterial amino acids that do not exist in human, such as mesodiaminopimelic acid.

Hence cell wall is destroyed, bacteria burst and die. Examples of antibiotic that target cell walls - penicillin.

For ribosomes, bacteria have different ribosomal arrangement like 70S compared to human 80S which I dont want to go into too much detail to freak you out from doing science :D. Yeah, so antibiotic kill the 70S ribosomes and hence no protein synthesis, bacteria die. And plus, they could target bacterial amino acid on ribosomes as well.
 

Survivor39

Premium Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
4,467
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Budz said:
For Survivor 39 -
Although i have searched everywhere for a worth while carreer future... It is impossible to decide the science i enjoy the best..
So i was thinking of doin a combined Bachelor in engineerin and Science but what major in the engineering would be science based

Also what majors should i pick if i would eventually wish to do nanotechnology.

I know that there is a seperate degree but id prefer a combined just in case...
Thanx
Well, all branches of engineering are considered science-based. But I guess chemical engineering has the most science. For more biological based, do biomedical engineering. For physics-based, do mechanical. All other branch such as mining, computing, environmental, they are pretty even in terms of how much science is taugh I guess.

if you wish to do nano, at UNSW, the major is already picked for you, that is nano! That itself is a major.

If you have no idea, just try every subjects in first year (Bio, chem, phy, geo, psyc, food, biotech) within your B Sc units. And see what you like best at uni.
 

Survivor39

Premium Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
4,467
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
howcome no one bothers to answer the anatomy question :D

Ok, there are 5 skin layers in the epidermis for thick skin (palm and sole). 4 in thin skin (all over your body except palms of your hand and soles of your feet).

Form daily activity, abrasion actually slough the uppermost layer off. However, what you lose is not living cells, but keratins on the uppermost layer. These are cells, which are dead, and whose nuclei and organelles are replaced by keratin protein. And the process of keratinisation occurs constantly to replace the sloughed cells on the upperlayer from lower layers.
 

Budz

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
134
Location
In the past
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Thanx heaps...
although when u said there is already a major at UNSW... is that in a BSc or BE
or is it simply a Bachelor of Nano

Because as i said id prefer to do a combined degree to keep my options open i guess..
thanx Survivor.
 

Survivor39

Premium Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
4,467
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Budz said:
Thanx heaps...
although when u said there is already a major at UNSW... is that in a BSc or BE
or is it simply a Bachelor of Nano

Because as i said id prefer to do a combined degree to keep my options open i guess..
thanx Survivor.
For your science degree, if you want to major in nano, you need to do B Science (Nanotechnology), a 4 year program.

You cannot major in Nano in a normal 3 year B Sc degree for some reason, unfortunately. Some units are restricted to Nanotech students, and you cannot do them in normal B Sc. So there's a slight problem in majoring in nano in your B Sc combining with engineering.
 

Budz

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
134
Location
In the past
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Thanx.. yeah, i was just notified that i was unable to do a combined degree in engineering and science with an eventual career prospect of nanotech.
 

simplistic

nice as ice
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
211
Location
somewhere away from you
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
1st one--> build up of lactic acid thus enzymes cannot function lower metabolism thus not enough energy to continue
2nd one--> lemon = acid thus kill the micobes on it (the usual enzymes thing thus microbes die)
3rd one-->no idea .. they r chemicals naturally derived from othe bacteria thus kill bacteria ..
4th one--> is it 3 or 5 .. cant remmeber did it in yr 11 umm duno the nxt thing probably yeah but isnt it 1st the dead cells on the top ?
thye r liek rubbed off from day to day activites but like from mitosis in the bottom layer the whole layer is maintained
 

mr EaZy

Active Member
Joined
May 28, 2004
Messages
1,727
Location
punchbowl bro- its the best place to live !
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Survivor39 said:
For biochemistry lover:

1. After vigorous excercise or running, why do you tend to stop and cannot continue? Answer from a biochemical perspective. (hint: What happens in your metabolism?)
.
of the top of my head,
is it because the reaction rate slowed down over time, and as too many bi-products and waste products accumulate/saturate in the cell at or near the active sites where chemical reactions occur, the body can no longer react at the rate it once did and tends to slow down; our body's exterior responding by moving into a position to maximise air intake, burn more carbs (but rate rate of burning is too slow). if it needs to carry on running or whatever- it'll exert itself with adrenaline, but if it doesnt, then the psychological forces acting on the body convince the mind to give it a break.

lol after 2 years of no science, this is all i can come up with.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top