CieL
...
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2004
- Messages
- 3,120
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
ROFL no way!wce06 said:That's quite a lancer you have there...not an EVO by any chance?
Figures would be very different.
ROFL no way!wce06 said:That's quite a lancer you have there...not an EVO by any chance?
Oh good one.veterandoggy said:well, if you want THAT much detail
wce06 said:That's quite a lancer you have there...not an EVO by any chance?
mate, just being sarcastic/silly. obviously these figures aren't EVO, nor are they stock '96 lancerCieL said:ROFL no way!
Figures would be very different.
LOL I remember my cousins complaining that I upset the balance of the car and made it unnecessarily heavy =( ... so cruel.veterandoggy said:well, it had the pod filter in at the time, but that isnt enough for much on its own, other than making it sound exactly like an integra type r.
unless you count being alone in the car a mod. i never knew how much difference 1-4 extra people make to a car's acceleration until i tried accelerating without passengers.
and i wasnt going to measure in the first place. i had only written down the distance to give a picture of how far it covered, since i couldnt picture how long it took any better than how far it went.
BWAHAHHAHA That's what I say to my bf!seremify007 said:LOL I remember my cousins complaining that I upset the balance of the car and made it unnecessarily heavy =( ... so cruel.
Hahaha... yes that happened quite a few times in malaysia. Some punk wants to race and then he's like "hmm.. car seems to have lost the power due to added weight. Better turn off the aircond"... how cruel.CieL said:BWAHAHHAHA That's what I say to my bf!
I usually drive alone, and one of the first times I picked him up, he got in and I was like.. "awww.. my car feels sluggish now.."
And then when some little nugget G'd me up with my bf and two other males in the car, we both went for it.. and I realised how much longer it took for my car to get to 90.. horrible!
I like it when it's just me in the car =]
I dont get what you're trying to say... your sentences are really ambiguous..veterandoggy said:okay, i did a little test on a flat road, and my lancer did the 0-100 in about 10 secs. i then tried doing 100-140 on an incline (the same one that i previously said i had done 140 on downhill) and it took just under 8 seconds.
okay, i'll be less ambiguous: 10 secs from 0-100 and 18 secs from 0-140, with the road becoming uphill after i hit 100KM/hCieL said:I dont get what you're trying to say... your sentences are really ambiguous..
Are you saying you did from 100kmh to 140kmh UPHILL, and that took 8secs itself?