gossipgirllll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2025
- Messages
- 639
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2025
what would u interpret it as ?thank you so much guyss
i loved both of your interpretations and this is pre helpful!!
Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
what would u interpret it as ?thank you so much guyss
i loved both of your interpretations and this is pre helpful!!
my first para would be on how unbridled ambition corrupts - but pacino takes on a more ambiguous approach w a positive outloko on ambition to reflect postmodern americawhat would u interpret it as ?
oooh thats interestingmy first para would be on how unbridled ambition corrupts - but pacino takes on a more ambiguous approach w a positive outloko on ambition to reflect postmodern america
my second para would be on how superficial identities ultimately face downfall + importance of public support in politics (which is something that is still relevant) - but this would be where i start talking abt religion more for kr3
ngl ive never split the rise and fall like this into 2 paras so idk if it's correct/effective
AWW THANK YOU!! NO YOURS IS LIKE JUST AS GOOD I JUST WROTE A LOT BECAUSE IM LOWKEY PROCRASTINATING FROM DOING ENGLISH STUDY RN LOLSTOP THIS IS SUCH A GOOD INTERPRETATION ASWW MINES SO BASIC OMG
prepare for everything lol discursives are simply about exploring two different ideas and use anecdotes (can be made up). honestly discursives should be one of the best to write asw compared to imaginative or persuasivedoes anyone actually know how to write a discursive. i literally can't!
also do you reckon i even bother with discursives since last year was discursive so i dont reckon they will force it upon us, right?
same idk how to write one hopefully we get imaginative or something this yeardoes anyone actually know how to write a discursive. i literally can't!
also do you reckon i even bother with discursives since last year was discursive so i dont reckon they will force it upon us, right?
wait what, this is news to me.u need statistics for a discursive right? so like do u just make them up if the topic doesn't work w ur pre planned one?
uhh no??u need statistics for a discursive right? so like do u just make them up if the topic doesn't work w ur pre planned one?
my teacher said refer to q in the topic sentence and then in the analysis for every quote and in concluding sentence, for each para. otherwise, you run the risk of just topping and tailing and hsc markers hate this apparentlyalso for adapting essays, how many times do u guys recommend referring to the q per paragraph? like at the end of every evidence cluster or like every few?
thats just what my tecaher said but from the overall reaction im thinking she might be wrongwait what, this is news to me.
do we actually need statistics?
A good discursive gives the reader food for thought, and many people like to do that through logos - further, statistics are helpful in the edge case of persuasives. But statistics are just another form of evidence, and as long as you have any sort of supporting evidence, be it statistics or anecdotes or intertextual allusions - and a variety of these - and they support your point, then it is a good discursive. Statistics are one of those easier pieces of evidence to find which may be why your teacher advised it, as for Mod C many people look for a formula through which to make a good piece.thats just what my tecaher said but from the overall reaction im thinking she might be wrong
i think by statistics she means like references to the wider worldu need statistics for a discursive right? so like do u just make them up if the topic doesn't work w ur pre planned one?
yes! sorry i dont think i worded it very well. this is what i meant loli think by statistics she means like references to the wider world
for example in my discursive i mention a tiktok video i saw related to my topic and i also mention a psychologist thats spoken abt the issue i raised, its sort of to make it look like ur connecting ur discursive to the wider world, not necessarily like finding out 39% of people smoke every year
Gang whatu need statistics for a discursive right? so like do u just make them up if the topic doesn't work w ur pre planned one?
Huh is this eco. But honestly just make up one that seems believevale cause they won’t search it up. At least for business studies, my teacher who’s a hsc marker says that they aren’t allowed to search up if ur case studies are correct so u can make up stuff. So maybe it’s the same for Engu need statistics for a discursive right? so like do u just make them up if the topic doesn't work w ur pre planned one?