• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Your dalliance with The Classics (1 Viewer)

Markazzo

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
49
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
I couldn't find a thread about it, so for those who care...

According to Time Magazine these are the 100 greatest novels all time:

Taken from http://www.time.com/time/2005/100books/the_complete_list.html

So how is everyone's grasp of the classics? Shamingly, I've only read a measly eight of the top 100 here, therefore next uni holidays I must devote myself to getting revenge on that dastardly Time magazine.
 

BronwynKate

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
326
Location
Boronia
Gender
Female
HSC
2001
You will be, you will be!

I've read quite a few of them, probably not as few as the original poster.
 
J

jhakka

Guest
I've read even less. How embarassing.

The downfalls of liking new pop-fiction. Oh well.
 

walrusbear

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
2,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
well i've only read 19
but intend to read most of them

it's worth noting they're modern classics too (after 1923 on that list)
 

walrusbear

Active Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
2,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
sarevok said:
not a single dickens in that list?
like i said, the list is only for english language books written after 1923
 

Markazzo

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
49
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Does the fact that we have all read so few of these alleged 'classics' reflect poorly on us, learned BOS folk, as readers? Surely not; it is the list that is wrong.
 

nwatts

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
1,938
Location
Greater Bulli
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
"Classics" as in, of the modern era. These aren't classics as the term is conventionally used. I'd only read 14 from the Time list. There are some ridiculous omissions, but you find that with any list like this. And only 10 from the other list.

I'm fairly picky with what I read, though.
 

nwatts

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
1,938
Location
Greater Bulli
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
miss_gtr said:
Yeah its a pretty dodgy list. But I actually liked the da vinci code. Keep in mind its the top 100 list of books most read by AUSTRALIANS.. On the global radar, we are nothing but a bleep :)
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it topped a worldwide poll of favourite books. Doesn't make it any less ridiculous.
 
G

genavania

Guest
ive read 9 from the times. they all look pretty good though. i thought it would be the other classics like Austen and that


i found the da vinci code such a bore. i read the first few chapters and got very bored. heaps of people have said they couldnt put it down though
 

rific

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
340
Location
Hunter Valley
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
I can't stand these sort of lists, if a book is good, someone will read it. If it is not good, someone will still read it, several million someones normally. Why do we need to be told if something is a classic, or worth reading? And people that believe they must read a book because it's an 'identified classic', or because 'everyone's reading it, quick, go buy a copy', quite simply, irritate me. There are many more books out there than you can ever possibly read, so why spend all your time catching up to everyone else and read what they are? Look around. Be different. Be surprised.

Lists of most-read are interesting from a sociological perspective, but even most of these are based on sophisms.
 

nwatts

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
1,938
Location
Greater Bulli
Gender
Female
HSC
2013
It's important to read/have knowledge of "identified classics" because they are often complied on a the basis of a work's literary significance. People enjoy reading things that have influenced (or been influenced by) other writers. Gives a sense of cohesion for those who are avid readers.

Popularlity based lists (like the A&G list) give you an idea of what the general readership values, which reflects what society values within literature. It was important to read The Da Vinci Code because it shows us how most readers read. Having an awareness of popular fiction will help you understand how society works, which is fundamental to communication. End of the day - want to relate to people better? Read what they're reading.
 

Markazzo

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
49
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
rific said:
I can't stand these sort of lists, if a book is good, someone will read it. If it is not good, someone will still read it, several million someones normally. Why do we need to be told if something is a classic, or worth reading? And people that believe they must read a book because it's an 'identified classic', or because 'everyone's reading it, quick, go buy a copy', quite simply, irritate me. There are many more books out there than you can ever possibly read, so why spend all your time catching up to everyone else and read what they are? Look around. Be different. Be surprised.

Lists of most-read are interesting from a sociological perspective, but even most of these are based on sophisms.
I posted the thread for a bit of fun, just because I happen to like both books and lists. I'm not suggesting these novels are the greatest ever written, or even that they are good, its just like, a conversation topic.

There's no need for anyone's feathers to be ruffled or brows to be furrowed, if people want to contribute to the thread then go ahead, but there's no reason to become all curmudgeonly.
 

Sarah168

London Calling
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
5,320
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
i like older novels anyway. There are great Russian and English novels from the 18th and 19th century.

I'm a classics addict. I first found the language difficult after being immersed in rubbish teen novels but find it so rewarding once you grasp the language of each writer.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top