• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Voting at 16 (1 Viewer)

BackCountrySnow

Active Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
1,972
Location
1984
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
jcurry said:
i second that, i know plenty of people under 18 who have much more of an idea about politics than more than a few adults
yes, and so do i. But for every one student who is aware of what is happening in the world and is economically informed there is 100 kids who don't.
16 year olds, in general, are so easily persuaded by factors which are totally irrelevent.
 

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
spiny norman said:
I think perhaps bringing in voluntary voting for people aged 16-18 is an idea, so that those who do have some opinion on politics are given the opportunity to vote if they so want.
hey i have an amazing idea

why not bring in voluntary voting for everyone over 18? :D
 

dieburndie

Eat, Sleep, Repeat
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
971
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
BackCountrySnow said:
yes, and so do i. But for every one student who is aware of what is happening in the world and is economically informed there is 100 kids who don't.
16 year olds, in general, are so easily persuaded by factors which are totally irrelevent.
How does this not also apply to the rest of the population?
 

jcurry

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
237
Location
Rouse Hill
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
BackCountrySnow said:
yes, and so do i. But for every one student who is aware of what is happening in the world and is economically informed there is 100 kids who don't.
16 year olds, in general, are so easily persuaded by factors which are totally irrelevent.
but if its voluntary 99%of those kids who arent informed won't vote and im sure theres more than a few 18-21yr olds who could be just as easily persuaded as a 16yrold and they can vote
 

sweet_as

Is with all of my people
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
188
Location
Eastern Suburbs
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
I used to be a member of the Democrats - and from memory they were the only party to advocate voting at 16.

This is out of the Democrats Youth Policy (found on the Young Democrats website)

2. Work to lower the age of enfranchisement to 16, with voluntary enrolment until 18, and compulsory voting once enrolled.
 

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
jcurry said:
but if its voluntary 99%of those kids who arent informed won't vote and im sure theres more than a few 18-21yr olds who could be just as easily persuaded as a 16yrold and they can vote
no actually what will happen is uniformed 16 year olds will be used by their parents to vote for the party the parents want

to take it to an extreme if you let 5+ year olds vote then obviously the party whose supporters had the most children on average would win since all children's votes would be used this way
 

DownInFlames

Token Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
548
Location
where I spend the vast majority of my time
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
ajdlinux said:
I think the idea of a test can be taken even further.

We need to develop a Maturity Quotient test. It would be taken initially at the age of 10, then 15, 20, 25 and 30, then every 10 years then after.

The result of your MQ test would be used to determine your eligibility to vote, get a drivers licence, get married, leave school, and so on. Hopefully it would eliminate donkey voters and crazy P-platers.

Now to write the test...
I second that. I mean, I know someone who voted family first, where the hell did that come from? Evidently not a well-informed decision.




Or labour could introduce a scheme where 16-y.os are allowed to vote but only if they pinky-swear to vote labour.


Plenty of people from 16 and up work, need centrelink, put petrol in their own cars, etc. and so maybe they should be allowed to vote if they want. People who don't give a shit about it just won't enroll to vote until they are 18. Your pseudo-idealists will vote socialist, (I met some on Beaumont Street, who said they "follow Karl Marx" and I thought it was kind of funny that they're trying to cover up their blatant communism with 'socialism') but they won't get enough votes from them to actually make a difference to their epic failing.
 

DownInFlames

Token Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
548
Location
where I spend the vast majority of my time
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
Captain Gh3y said:
no actually what will happen is uniformed 16 year olds will be used by their parents to vote for the party the parents want

to take it to an extreme if you let 5+ year olds vote then obviously the party whose supporters had the most children on average would win since all children's votes would be used this way
family first would win because of all the people that don't beleive in contraception.
 

ajdlinux

Mod: ANU, ATAR/HSC Marks
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,890
Location
Port Macquarie / Canberra
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
sweet_as said:
I used to be a member of the Democrats - and from memory they were the only party to advocate voting at 16.

This is out of the Democrats Youth Policy (found on the Young Democrats website)

2. Work to lower the age of enfranchisement to 16, with voluntary enrolment until 18, and compulsory voting once enrolled.
Greens too: http://greens.org.au/about/policy/policy.php?policy_id=36

The Australian Greens will:

...

17. support the following electoral reforms:
* all Australian citizens over the age of 16 to be eligible to vote;
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
830
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
i don't like the idea, because there are all these teenagers who will vote for whoever has the best slogan or advertising campaign... very few of the 16-year-olds i know actually care about policies. i.e. a girl in one of my classes was wearing a Kevin '07 t-shirt, so my friend asked whether she liked his policies or just the slogan. it was the slogan. that is NOT the type of person i want allowed to vote. not that it matters because she will be able to at the next federal election anyway... but i suppose there's idiots in every age bracket.
 

Captain Gh3y

Rhinorhondothackasaurus
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
4,153
Location
falling from grace with god
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
You guys give the average Australian adult way to much credit when it comes to the reasons for who they vote for.

A slogan isn't really a much better or worse reason than "It's who our family/parents always vote for"
 

xJennax

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
407
Location
Gold Coast
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
People have suggested that we should be able to vote at 16, or that we shouldn't have to pay tax until we're 18, and able to vote.
 

ippie

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
136
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
Captain Gh3y said:
You guys give the average Australian adult way to much credit when it comes to the reasons for who they vote for.

A slogan isn't really a much better or worse reason than "It's who our family/parents always vote for"
FUCK I HATE THAT SO MUCH. I saw it on that SBS show, where they had a massive audience and this lady asked them questions and shit.

Anyway, all the young people were like "oh im voting for ____ coz my family always has" - like what the fuck, you have your own beliefs and shit! Like, piss off, you don't deserve a vote.

I also hate how people got swayed when johnfuckinghoward said he could decrease interest rates. And a million retards fell for it. LIKE, RETARDS!!!!!!!!! He can't INFLUENCE THE FUCKING INT. RATES COZ HE DOESNT HAVE THE POWER TO

OMFG. I wanted to like slap those people who fell for it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top