Success One's solution incorrect? (1 Viewer)

Saintly Devil

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2002
Messages
107
For the 1984 Mathematics HSC Question 9) b)

"The point P(x,y) is equidistant from the lines y=3 3x+4y-18=0, and lies in the shaded region of the diagram.

Find the equation of the locus of P"

The anwer given by the Success One book's is y = -x/3 + 11/3. I got the answer y = -3x/8 + 30/8. Is the answer given by success one incorrect? because I graphed both equations and my answer was actually equidistant from the two lines given - not success one's.

Can someone clarify this?
 

Viper

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
112
Location
Central Coast
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I got the same answer as you...

But im not the greatest locus mathematitian going around...

Cheers
 

Abide

Wie gehts?
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
89
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
can either of you please post what you do to get the answer? :confused:
cos i really have nfi :p :D
lol
 

LadyMoon

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
109
Location
Watching over you from the Moon
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
You mean 1994? I remembered cause i did this paper a few days ago.

Apply the perpendicular distance formula, and the distance formula.
if X lies on y=3, then the coordinates of X(x,3)
therefore the distance from X to P is 3-y.

and the distance from P to the line 3x + 4y - 18=0 is equal to (3x + 4y -18)/5

equate the two:
5(3-y)=3x +4y -18

therefore y=-x/3 + 11/3
and x>2 (to satisfy the shaded region)

I got the same answer as the Book I use.
And i did graph it and according to WinPlot its looks correct, i tried your soultion also, you solution is not equidistant.

Furthermore how did you get that solution?
 

Saintly Devil

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2002
Messages
107
Yes, sorry, i meant 1994.

Hmm. yes, after once more considering, I think the solution given by Success One may be correct.

I did it by assuming that the locus would be a line with a gradient half that of 3x + 4y -18=0.

So I used the equation

3x + 4y -18 +k(y-3)=0
3x + y(4+k) -18 - 3k = 0

therefore the gradient of the line would be -3/(4+k)
As I assumed the gradient would be half of 3x + 4y -18=0 , I got

(-3/4 )2 = -3/(4+k)
k=4

sub into original equation

3x + 4y -18+ 4(y-3) = 0
y = -3x/8 + 30/8

But I can see this is wrong, because it assumes equidistant in terms of the y co-ordinates, not the actual perpendicular distance.
Thanks.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top