You are all completely misunderstanding me, and while I can see why you may do so, I'm really disappointed for not taking it at what I mean to be.
I am not trying to show any superiority, though I do think that the method by which bored of studies is showing notes is lacking in description and structure, and will become too complex when more is added.
I was not asking about site looks and design; I agree hscstuff looks crap, and that PHP and the bored of studies look is a great enhanchement on HTML look of hscstuff. That was not the issue.
I am planning and in the process of trying to ship hscstuff notes to bored of studies, and to cancel the existene of hscstuff, as you can see therefore it's not about superiority.
Ian, you wouldn't have a clue because you've only spoken and replied to me in your own superioristic (if that's a word) sense. You have not yet responded sensibly.
While I hope to see the sites merged in the near future - or more hopefully in the near past, but that won't happen - I don't think they are currently compatible. The information that is on hscstuff can not be put onto bored of studies atm, due to the lack of information and structure shown on bos resources pages.
I am seriously posing this question, so that we can try and improve bos together, not as opposition. I am not trying to oppose, I am trying to improve for the common good.
While I understand the poll was a bad way of posing this, I couldn't find any better that would allow people to compare in order to suggest. The nature of a poll, though, is that the question needs absolute terms of "best" for it to be a poll. The system is flawed, I'm sorry.
But I think it is you who are being immature and foolish to think that I was aiming to be so capitalistic and stuck up.
I'm really upset at you.
Thanks for your confidence.
- Joel