-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Nihilistic and existential are different, am I right? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter SmileyCam
- Start date
A lot of existentialists are misinterpreted as being nihilistic when, in fact, that is one of the things that they actually stand against. This comes back to the idea of readings of a text and you can certainly do a nihilistic reading of an existentialist text. While this may be the case I think it would be a mistake to equate existentialism and nihilism to mean the same thing.
A lot of existentialists start with the nihilistic concept that there is no meaning, that there is no inherent meaning in human existence (something which comes out stronger from an aetheistic stand point). While they may start here, many of them will then seek a way to find a certain sense of meaning within this meaninglessness. An example is Albert Camus when he looks at the futile labours of Sisyphus (greek dude rolling the boulder up a hill) yet manages to conclude that "sisyphus must be happy" given the powerful moments when he triumphs over the absurdity of his situation.
Taking another example, Nietzsche. He viewed christianity as being nihilistic. If you ever read much of his stuff you will soon notice that he isn't exactly the biggest supporter of christianity and a big reason for this is the nihilistic tendencies that he percieves in the religion [obsessing over the after life while they abstain from living life to the fullest. In this rejection of the worldly he sees nihilism].
I hope those general statments help you out. In the end it's my personal view that while nihilism is a prominent subject for many of the existentialists, this does not make nihilism and existentialism the same thing.
A lot of existentialists start with the nihilistic concept that there is no meaning, that there is no inherent meaning in human existence (something which comes out stronger from an aetheistic stand point). While they may start here, many of them will then seek a way to find a certain sense of meaning within this meaninglessness. An example is Albert Camus when he looks at the futile labours of Sisyphus (greek dude rolling the boulder up a hill) yet manages to conclude that "sisyphus must be happy" given the powerful moments when he triumphs over the absurdity of his situation.
Taking another example, Nietzsche. He viewed christianity as being nihilistic. If you ever read much of his stuff you will soon notice that he isn't exactly the biggest supporter of christianity and a big reason for this is the nihilistic tendencies that he percieves in the religion [obsessing over the after life while they abstain from living life to the fullest. In this rejection of the worldly he sees nihilism].
I hope those general statments help you out. In the end it's my personal view that while nihilism is a prominent subject for many of the existentialists, this does not make nihilism and existentialism the same thing.
Last edited:
velox
Retired
Hmm KFunk, you didn't answer the question =/
bugs
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Messages
- 104
hmmmm......
nihilism= total lack of belief in religion or moral principles and duties-- set out by established laws and institutions- i guess Edmond could be regarded as 'nihilistic' ????
existentialism= modern philosphical ideas, which teach the importance of human existence and the freedom and responsibility of the individual to make decisions based on personal experience.
damn! it is related -- perhaps nihilism is more sceptical................
nihilism= total lack of belief in religion or moral principles and duties-- set out by established laws and institutions- i guess Edmond could be regarded as 'nihilistic' ????
existentialism= modern philosphical ideas, which teach the importance of human existence and the freedom and responsibility of the individual to make decisions based on personal experience.
damn! it is related -- perhaps nihilism is more sceptical................