pretty sure / i hope soguys was this the answer to 14)a)?View attachment 36769
Yep that's correctguys was this the answer to 14)a)?View attachment 36769
Yes I did. I now have hope!anyone else get 16d as 358
but from this, the answer was C right, with horizontal asymtote?Yeah I got D as well, if you just spam in progressively increasing values of y the gradient results in constantly positive values and D was the only one that exhibited something like that
I think the way UAC calculates atar from the HSC marks makes it slightly more fair, not sure thoughSo a person who got 67 will only be 9 marks off a person that’s got 97? Doesn’t seem very fair to high achievers
Yea, once scaling gets applied the person whose HSC mark ended up being 100 instead of 90 gets a significantly higher aggregate (which contributes to ATAR)I think the way UAC calculates atar from the HSC marks makes it slightly more fair, not sure though
About q9, I felt (A) was the right answer but I heard my friends arguing it was (D), could you consider why?Solutions, no guarantee theyre correctAdobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
Note 13ei) is a bit wrong because didn't have z score table
Other parts could be wrong
I think UAC uses only the HSC aligned mark and then scales that based on their own thing, which is skewed non-linearly from the very high marks (which is what adjusts it so that a student who gets 98-->100 is rewarded over the 67-->90), which is what counts to your aggregrate:Yea, once scaling gets applied the person whose HSC mark ended up being 100 instead of 90 gets a significantly higher aggregate (which contributes to ATAR)
Pretty sure UAC doesn’t even look at the HSC aligned mark, they only look at the raw marks
oh you know what. D is correctAbout q9, I felt (A) was the right answer but I heard my friends arguing it was (D), could you consider why?