Induction help :( (1 Viewer)

drewgcn

postpantsism
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
337
Location
Oatley...land of oats.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
I'm stuck on these questions.

Prove that 3^3n + 2^(n+2) is divisible by 5 for n>=1.

Prove that 3^n + 7^n is divisible by 10 if n is an odd integer >=1
(Hint: In step 2, assume n = k (odd); In step 3, prove true for n = k+2)

Prove that (n^2) + 2n is divisible by 8 if n is an even integer >=2.

Pre-emptive thanks :).
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Prove that 33n + 2(n+2) is divisible by 5 for n>1.
Let n = 1
35 is divisible by 5
.: S1 is true
Assume n=k
33k +2(k+2) = 5N (where N is an integer)
Let n=k+1
33k+3 +2(k+3)
33k.33 + 2k.23
Using assumption
33k = 5N - 2(k+2)

(5N - 2(k+2)).33 + 2k.23
= 33.5N - 332(k+2) + 2k+2.2
= 33.5N - 2(k+2)[33 - 2]
= 33.5N - 2(k+2)[25]
= 5[33.N - 2(k+2).5
= 5M (where M is an integer)

.: If n=k is true then n=k+1 is true hence all n>1

I'll do others later :p
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Prove that 3^n + 7^n is divisible by 10 if n is an odd integer n>1
(Hint: In step 2, assume n = k (odd); In step 3, prove true for n = k+2)


3n+7n
Show n = 1 is true
10 = 10
.:S1 is true
Assume n=k
3k+7k=10N (where N is an integer)
Let n = k+2
3k+2+7k+2
From assumption
(10N-7k)9 + 7k.49
= 9.10N - 9.7k + 7k.49
= 9.10N - 7k(9 - 49)
= 9.10N - 7k(-40)
= 10[9+7k.40]
= 10M (where M is an integer)
When n=k is true then n=k+2 is true hence for all n>1




Prove that (n2) + 2n is divisible by 8 if n is an even integer n>2.

n2 + 2n
Show n = 2 is true
8 = 8
.: S2 is true

Assume n = k
k2 + 2k = 8N (where N is an integer)
Let n=k+2
(k+2)2 + 2k+4
= k2+4k+4+2k+4
= k2+6k+8
From assumption
= (8N-2k) + 6k+8
= 16+4k
= 4[4+k]
= 4M (where M is an integer)

Since 4 is a factor of 8, it is divisble by multiple of 8s.
Hence, if n=k is true then n=k+2 is true therefore by mathematical induction n is true for all n>2

Edit: fixed it up
 
Last edited by a moderator:

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
From assumption
= (8-2k) + 6k+8


Shouldn't this step be (8N-2k) + 6k + 8, since N isn't necessarily 1?


Since 4 is a factor of 8, it is divisble by multiple of 8s.

If M = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc. then 4M is not divisible by 8. I'm not sure whether you're right here or not - if you work it out to be something like 16M, then yes, it's always divisible by 8, but 4M is not...

Hmmm, I might just learn a little more on induction from this. :)


I_F
 

drewgcn

postpantsism
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
337
Location
Oatley...land of oats.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
pLuvia said:
...
33k.33 + 2k.23
Using assumption
33k = 5N - 2(k+2)

(5N - 2(k+2)).33 + 2k.23
= 33.5N - 332(k+2) + 2k+2.2
= 33.5N - 2(k+2)[33 - 2]
= 33.5N - 2(k+2)[25]...
And there, good children, was the magical step!
Kudos to you pLuvia :)

I think I understand, I'll try the others now.
 

drewgcn

postpantsism
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
337
Location
Oatley...land of oats.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
insert-username said:
From assumption
= (8-2k) + 6k+8


Shouldn't this step be (8N-2k) + 6k + 8, since N isn't necessarily 1?
I think that was just a typo.

insert-username said:
Since 4 is a factor of 8, it is divisble by multiple of 8s.

If M = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc. then 4M is not divisible by 8. I'm not sure whether you're right here or not - if you work it out to be something like 16M, then yes, it's always divisible by 8, but 4M is not...

I_F
Yeah thats what's confusing me as well.

I got
Step 3: Prove true for n = k + 2
(k+2)^2 + 2(k+2) = k^2 + 4k + 4 + 2k + 4
.........................= k^2 + 2k + 4k + 8
..........................................................(k^2) + 2k = 8N from assumption
.........................= 8N + 4k + 8
.........................= 8(N + 1) + 4k

and then the 4K ruins it all.
 

drewgcn

postpantsism
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
337
Location
Oatley...land of oats.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
I think I just got it, you guys will probably be able to tell me if so.
Continuing from the last post

.........................= 8N + 4k + 8
.........................= 8(N + 1 + k/2)
Since k is an even integer, k/2 must also be an integer.
Therefore (N + 1 + k/2) is an integer, and therefore it is true for n = k + 2.
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
I don't remember how to prove that it is divisible by 8 :( Can someone tell me please?

Since 4 is a factor of 8, it is divisble by multiple of 8s.

If M = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc. then 4M is not divisible by 8. I'm not sure whether you're right here or not - if you work it out to be something like 16M, then yes, it's always divisible by 8, but 4M is not...

Hmmm, I might just learn a little more on induction from this.
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
insert-username said:
From assumption
= (8-2k) + 6k+8


Shouldn't this step be (8N-2k) + 6k + 8, since N isn't necessarily 1?


I_F
Yeh sorry, typo :)
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
If a number is divisble by 4, and then that factor is divisible by 2, then that number is divisible by 8. E.g. 4 goes into 32 eight times. 8 is divisible by 2, so 32 is divisible by 8. 4 goes into 20 five times, but 5 is not divisible by 2, so 20 iss not divisible by 8.


I_F
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Proof of what insert-username said:

Let p be an integer divisible by 4: p = 4q, where q is some integer

q is divisble by 2: q = 2r, where r is some integer

.: p = 4.2r = 8r, hence p is divisible by 8.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top