How to Analyse Sources (1 Viewer)

emilee.kime

New Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
7
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
corroboration is also important i.e how the historian could gain a further perspective by looking at other sources.
or how the source could be improved.
eg. a source with a mainly British perspective could be imporved by having a German, French etc perspective.
hope that helps.
xo.
 

Mclusky

Jerk
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
13
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
The 'W' Words:

What is the source?
Who wrote/took/composed it?
For Whom did they write it for?
When did they write it?
Where did they write it?
Why did they write it?

And yeah, corroborative evidence is very important.
 

Eddy1ner

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
6
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Type (e.g visual or memoir and Primary/Secondary)
Author
Context (WWI, WWII etc)
Audience (Who was it intended for)
Motive (Why was it produced?)
Perspective (From a Civilian, an Officer, German, English)
Content (What is in the actual source)
Usefulness (Is a Home fronts source useful for studying trench warfare?)
Reliability (How trustworthy, does it lack clarity or information?? etc.. )

Hope this helps.
 

Use By '09

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
1
Location
Broulee
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Yeah my modern class came up with an acronym in order to remember:

Old
Men
Can
Always
Piss
Red
...
Usually

we are not the most politcally correct class

;)
 

e.eyvaz

New Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
19
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
M-motive
A-audience
R- reliability
C-content
O-origin

(MARCO)
 

spagbowl

bread.
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
96
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
ok so for analysing sources does anyone have any essay structures for the two essays in section one??
my teacher said to do like:

blank statement
source one- usefulness and reliability
source two- usefulness and reliability
cinclusion

for the second essay that is.

also how do u write a source evaluation for two sources. Do you judge the sources together as a unit. eg source 1 and two are very useful for a historian..... when you write your blank statement?
how would you make a blank statement about them if one is really useful and the other one isn't at all?
 

xx-lozz-xx

New Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
14
Location
strathfield
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
CARMOP was the best.

will use it for my exam tomorrow :spin:
i remebered it off by heart.


really relieved now THANKKKKS
 

annabackwards

<3 Prophet 9
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
4,670
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
spagbowl said:
ok so for analysing sources does anyone have any essay structures for the two essays in section one??
my teacher said to do like:

blank statement
source one- usefulness and reliability
source two- usefulness and reliability
cinclusion

for the second essay that is.

also how do u write a source evaluation for two sources. Do you judge the sources together as a unit. eg source 1 and two are very useful for a historian..... when you write your blank statement?
how would you make a blank statement about them if one is really useful and the other one isn't at all?
For my structure it is just

Paragraph 1: Source one- usefulness and reliability
Paragraph 2: Source two- usefulness and reliability

That's it if they don't ask me to compare the usefulness and i'm out of time. If they do ask me or i have extra time I'd use the structure above minus the blank statement. In the conclusion I'd compare/contrast the sources.
 

Zephyrio

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
950
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
My teacher told me to never ever compare or contrast the sources.
 

nosh22

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
84
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
7 points to look at : origin, motive, content, audience, perspective and how these determine reliability and usefulness.
Equally, when analysing sources, a good idea for creating flow is to look at how the audience influences motive and thus shapes the content.

You're right on the mark!:)
 

yasbic

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
4
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
USE MARCO!

Motive Audience Reliability Content & Origin
 

Zee Zappo

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
42
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Thanks for the advice mate.
Sucks to be me....my school's best history teacher left to become head teacher at Sydney North Girls and I am stuck with a teacher who hasn't taught snr history for over 10 yrs =S
so yeah we pretty much read the textbook and do questions 24/7 . no class discussions. no tips. N O T H I N G .
if i dont fail modern I'll be a happy chap.
 

PakZilla

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
8
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
ayye if a question asks about usefulness and reliability , what should be determined first ?
 

Sunners

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
58
Location
Eastern Suburbs
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Uni Grad
2018
ayye if a question asks about usefulness and reliability , what should be determined first ?
Our teacher says reliability first because we get asked 'how useful would Source A be' as the question itself and told to consider perspective and reliability in our answers to that question. We say it's reliable because ___ and therefore it is useful.
 

ando08182

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
36
Location
Bowral
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Ok so I have to do a Source analysis , explaining the usefulness of each source to an historian studying the impact of the war on women's lives and experiences in Britain, making reference to the perspective and reliability of each. If for one particular source, it has no date, no author and no origin, but through research I made an educated guess at who the author is, I found out more information about him that would lead to changing the intended audience and therefore the reliability, how do I write my answer this question? :/ Thank you in advance!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top