dora_18
Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Messages
- 746
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
but you did respond...robbie1 said:Anyway, there is no need to respond to your post
but you did respond...robbie1 said:Anyway, there is no need to respond to your post
Yes, that's clearly it. I want to feel you inside me robbie, there's no use fighting it anymore.robbie1 said:Everywhere I post, you are there almost straight away. Some sort of obsession you have with me?
Anyway, there is no need to respond to your post. My perception of you as being somewhat of an intelligent person just evaporated.
An intelligent person like you, who states that everything adam and eve were not is immoral. So black people are immoral. God will smite them. The perception eveporated when you realised they were backing up arguments with reason.robbie1 said:Anyway, there is no need to respond to your post. My perception of you as being somewhat of an intelligent person just evaporated.
What do you base that on?And I still managed to grow up into a rational human being -
How is it rational to hate someone based on their sexual preference? Disliking faggy gays perhaps (e.g. those that dress up as women and/or just act like over the top drama queens), but not homosexuals in general.bshoc said:Fallacy, I grew up in a household where both parents were generally supportive of these sorts of thing (call it liberal, art fart .. whatever). And I still managed to grow up into a rational human being - that dislikes gays and their very presence in society - obviously not becuase of any whacked out christian morals, but my point still stands.
It isn't necessary fallacious. You're sample size is not big enough to disprove what he stated when he did not use the definite article, while the burden of proof should lie on him, you cannot disprove it with yourself when he said chances are.bshoc said:Fallacy, I grew up in a household where both parents were generally supportive of these sorts of thing (call it liberal, art fart .. whatever). And I still managed to grow up into a rational human being - that dislikes gays and their very presence in society - obviously not becuase of any whacked out christian morals, but my point still stands.
Because societies' influence on young minds begins and ends with their parents.Fallacy, I grew up in a household where both parents were generally supportive of these sorts of thing (call it liberal, art fart .. whatever). And I still managed to grow up into a rational human being - that dislikes gays and their very presence in society - obviously not becuase of any whacked out christian morals, but my point still stands.
Why would you discriminate against "faggy gays" as appose to "ordinary" homosexuals? If thats the way they want to express themselves thats fine, they're just clothes!...i don't go to rallies with banners saying "KILL THE SURFIES" because some guys choose to wear their pants past their knees with cheap boxers hanging out- a look that i detest.Liberal Scum said:How is it rational to hate someone based on their sexual preference? Disliking faggy gays perhaps (e.g. those that dress up as women and/or just act like over the top drama queens), but not homosexuals in general.
exactly, i mean a lot of influence on those sorts of things comes out of a household but at the same time you have other influences impacting on you as well.Not-That-Bright said:Because societies' influence on young minds begins and ends with their parents.
He said dislike, not hate, and he was only raising it as a possibility, a possibility that is much like your position regarding some surfies.dora_18 said:Why would you discriminate against "faggy gays" as appose to "ordinary" homosexuals? If thats the way they want to express themselves thats fine, they're just clothes!...i don't go to rallies with banners saying "KILL THE SURFIES" because some guys choose to wear their pants past their knees with cheap boxers hanging out- a look that i detest.
whats wrong with not liking camp gays? its the personality i dont like, not the sexual preference. just like i dont like really loud annoying girls or whatever.dora_18 said:Why would you discriminate against "faggy gays" as appose to "ordinary" homosexuals? If thats the way they want to express themselves thats fine, they're just clothes!
When did I ever say I wanted them dead? I just have a distaste for them and would in general avoid associating with any man who wore a skirt and said "oh myyyy gosshhhhh" at every opportunity, regardless of their orientation, in much the same way as I'd imagine you don't talk to surfies much.dora_18 said:Why would you discriminate against "faggy gays" as appose to "ordinary" homosexuals? If thats the way they want to express themselves thats fine, they're just clothes!...i don't go to rallies with banners saying "KILL THE SURFIES" because some guys choose to wear their pants past their knees with cheap boxers hanging out- a look that i detest.