• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Greens launch Senate inquiry against endless population growth, Liberals back it (1 Viewer)

Riet

Tomcat Pilot
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,622
Location
Miramar, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
would you go without rice too? And just wear hemp clothing? like seriously the world can support many more people if we use the most efficient crops possible but it is a pretty shit existence. Relative comfort is an issue.
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
no m8 im saying there is land being used for cows that could be used for vegies
and land being used for N/A that can be used for goats

we can eat so much roast goat and vegies and everyone will be happy
 
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
3,272
Location
The Pub
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
m8 australian farmers are getting rich as nazis, selling FERAL goats to live export markets in muslim malaysia and iraq and shit, cant wait to get in on that, dumb muslims
 

supercalamari

you've got the love
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,590
Location
Bathtub
Gender
Female
HSC
2010
I'd be fine with it, but I doubt meat-eaters would.
I heard that if American cut its' red meat consumption by 10% we could feed everyone starving in third world countries. Not sure if its true.
 

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,924
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
I heard that if American cut its' red meat consumption by 10% we could feed everyone starving in third world countries. Not sure if its true.

even if 10% of America's meat consumption would be enough to feed Starving nations, the reason these nations aren't getting the meat is not because the Americans are eating it instead of them
 
Last edited:

Slidey

But pieces of what?
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
6,600
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I heard that if American cut its' red meat consumption by 10% we could feed everyone starving in third world countries. Not sure if its true.
There is already enough food in the world to feed these people, even ignoring Western consumption patterns (so while less meat more plants/grains would significantly alleviate the problem, let's ignore it in this case). Most of the problems of starvation in the world's poor nations stem from government corruption and/or civil war.
 

banco55

Active Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,577
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
We gain very little from population driven by large scale immigration (and stand to lose a lot). Time to lock the gates.
 

aussie-boy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
610
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
the fact of the matter is for the free market to adopt renewable energy we need a carbon tax. Most people are too selfish/apathetic to want to switch and so while coal is the cheapest form of electricity, will keep using it.
This is BS, simply because the Gov owns and operates all fossil fuel generation in Australia. The Gov also sets the wholesale price... there is no competition in the market.

If the Gov decides to turn off all the coal power stations and build renewable energy stations (obviously gradually) then that is exactly what will happen.

For your argument to work, a private company would then have to go and fund a $4-5bn coal power station (and who in this day in age is going to do that? - when increased use of renewables will eventually lead to massive price drops)
 

Riet

Tomcat Pilot
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,622
Location
Miramar, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
umm that's only because they aren't allowed to because of unionist pigs, if NSW had privatised electricity you think someone like BHP wouldn't be able to build power stations? The cost to provide a large number of people with renewables isn't exactly low and coal is still the cheapest per kW.h
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
the fact of the matter is for the free market to adopt renewable energy we need a carbon tax

lol
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
for the free market to function properly, we need government intervention
 

aussie-boy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
610
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
umm that's only because they aren't allowed to because of unionist pigs, if NSW had privatised electricity you think someone like BHP wouldn't be able to build power stations? The cost to provide a large number of people with renewables isn't exactly low and coal is still the cheapest per kW.h
lol, so...

the Government has the potential to easily make the switch to renewables,

and this is bad because they are "pigs"/we want private corporations to be able to build environmentally destructive generators

BUT we actually want renewable energy to be used, so lets screw these private companies with a carbon tax, in order to get to the same situation we would have been in had the Gov just built the damn power stations

:hammer:
 

Riet

Tomcat Pilot
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,622
Location
Miramar, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
lol, so...

the Government has the potential to easily make the switch to renewables,

and this is bad because they are "pigs"/we want private corporations to be able to build environmentally destructive generators

BUT we actually want renewable energy to be used, so lets screw these private companies with a carbon tax, in order to get to the same situation we would have been in had the Gov just built the damn power stations

:hammer:
How do you suppose the government raises the funds for new powerstations?
 

aussie-boy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
610
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
How do you suppose the government raises the funds for new powerstations?
If the private sector has the financial capacity to build a power station, than the Government (with an increased capacity to borrow) certainly does

In any case, this goes beyond your original argument - I've already shown that there is an alternative that can easily be instituted with sufficient political will

This is why Abbott's idea is not so far fetched, except for the fact that he wants to throw money at geo-sequestration rather than renewables - which is absurd
 

Riet

Tomcat Pilot
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
3,622
Location
Miramar, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Oh I see so the government will borrow money and then they will pay it back with?

My point is that the government is going to paying for it with taxpayers money anyway.
As with most other services electricity is one that can be provided significantly more efficiently by the private sector.
The problem is that there is no reason why one would stop using coal in Australia unless the government makes it less competitive to do so, as the general population can't tangibly see the benefits of using green energy and so won't pay more for it. The money from a carbon tax could be used to subsidise the high capital cost of construction CSP and Nuclear power plants. By putting an artificial cost on coal and making it cheaper for smaller companies to start renewable electricity production we would see the springing up of many more small providers as is the case in places like Germany.
 
Last edited:

SylviaB

Just Bee Yourself 🐝
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
6,924
Location
Lidcombe
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
Fuck the average Australian. They don't own this country, or have any more right to access it than any other human being on this planet.

Should any consideration be given to the fact that some of these individuals have criminal records etc? Or not?

Obviously not including drug/other victimless offences
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top