-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
Globalisation Assignment...? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter mandalay
- Start date
rorix..what are you on about? It's the case study....unless you're sarcasm didnt come off as well as it was supposed to.
Anyway, it might help if you told us what country you were thinking of researching....
Anyway, it might help if you told us what country you were thinking of researching....
mandalay
cortigiana onesta
- Joined
- May 23, 2004
- Messages
- 167
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
Hey Sarah 
Haven't seen you around since the Mrs Dalloway/The Hours stuff. How've you been?
I'm not really picky in regards to the country I'll be doing. I was just hoping someone had already done a similar assignment and could pass it down to me lol
It seemed like a very broad question so I look a shot
Haven't seen you around since the Mrs Dalloway/The Hours stuff. How've you been?
I'm not really picky in regards to the country I'll be doing. I was just hoping someone had already done a similar assignment and could pass it down to me lol
It seemed like a very broad question so I look a shot
you could try showing the effect of whats happend in mexico.
in short
mexico pre- regan administration pretty decent economy (look up figures whereever)
then freetrade agreement established.
then boarders militarised.
this free trade agreement while apparently being "globalisation" is not, when you consider people are not allowed to freely cross the boarder.
the mexican economy goes down, american capital and foreign invest ment gets out... mexican economy crashes THEN american capital gets in, factories move there cause its cheaper.
American Economy ultimatly benefits. This is "Globalisation". (allthough not globalisation by Adam Smiths standards, adam smith said to have free trade you first and foremost must allow free passage of people, the reality is more people crossed boarders in the first half of the century than the latter half)
any way this is all very vague but i forget the statistics and shit. I hate the word "globalisation". Globalisation as we say it means investor rights globalisation when in reality it should mean no boarders. Reality is people are more stingy bout boarders now then ever, and investors in first world countries benefit from lack of people mooving, but increased amount of capital flowing across boarders.
The us mexico free trade agreement shows how the firstworld is getting richer and the poor poorer. Shows how we live of their backs.
Any way ive blabed enough now. Im dong economics at univesity for this reason, to change this fucked uperd ness.
in short
mexico pre- regan administration pretty decent economy (look up figures whereever)
then freetrade agreement established.
then boarders militarised.
this free trade agreement while apparently being "globalisation" is not, when you consider people are not allowed to freely cross the boarder.
the mexican economy goes down, american capital and foreign invest ment gets out... mexican economy crashes THEN american capital gets in, factories move there cause its cheaper.
American Economy ultimatly benefits. This is "Globalisation". (allthough not globalisation by Adam Smiths standards, adam smith said to have free trade you first and foremost must allow free passage of people, the reality is more people crossed boarders in the first half of the century than the latter half)
any way this is all very vague but i forget the statistics and shit. I hate the word "globalisation". Globalisation as we say it means investor rights globalisation when in reality it should mean no boarders. Reality is people are more stingy bout boarders now then ever, and investors in first world countries benefit from lack of people mooving, but increased amount of capital flowing across boarders.
The us mexico free trade agreement shows how the firstworld is getting richer and the poor poorer. Shows how we live of their backs.
Any way ive blabed enough now. Im dong economics at univesity for this reason, to change this fucked uperd ness.
