Circuit query + copyright (1 Viewer)

Seraph

Now You've done it.......
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
897
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Circuit query!!

hi i have a few questions regarding the D type flip flop and the RS Flip flop , it is really vague in my text book :p ..........

anyway

Firstly, the D flip flop stores 1 bit right? (of course we can combine these into P registers to store qutie a few) , for it to actually store a bit of data , does the clock Input have to be set to 1 at the beginning...?

however... the RS flip-flop stores 1 bit as well? Whats going on here? whats the major difference here between the two circuits im really confused at the complement Of Q as well , sure it serves as an input value in the Flip Flop but other than that , what is its purpose?

tx!
 
Last edited:

sunny

meh.
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
5,350
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Seraph said:
Firstly, the D flip flop stores 1 bit right?
Yes.

Seraph said:
for it to actually store a bit of data , does the clock Input have to be set to 1 at the beginning...?
This depends on the type of D flip flop. What kind of D FF are you looking at? Edge triggered D FFs only store the value in the input on a clock transition. Negative edge triggered FFs store the value on a falling clock edge, and positive edge triggered FFs store on the rising clock edge.

Seraph said:
however... the RS flip-flop stores 1 bit as well? Whats going on here? whats the major difference here between the two circuits im really confused at the complement Of Q as well , sure it serves as an input value in the Flip Flop but other than that , what is its purpose?
The RS (or SR) FF and the D FF both store 1 bit (there are many types of FFs, like JK and T FFs that all one bit). But the difference lies in the way that it is stored. Most types of FFs all have their kind of flaws - and depending on the application, one type of FF might not be suited to it's job because its flaw.

Lets look at the RS flip flop. Do you understand the concept of the master and slave in the RS flip flop? If not, don't read on.

A flaw the master slave SR FF can best be explained by a scenario. First lets look at the typical operation:

1) A high clock signal enters the master of the SR FF. As a consequence, the master latch reads its input, and latches onto this value.
2) The clock becomes low, the inverter driving the clock signal of the slave turns the slave latch on, and it reads the value on the master's output, latching on to it.
3) The information is stored.

Now, lets consider this scenario:
1) A high clock signal enters the master of the SR FF. As a consequence, the master latch reads its input. During the high of the clock cycle, the input goes high, and the master latch latches onto this value. But, during this same high clock cycle, the input goes low again. But it is already too late, the master latch has already latched on to the first high signal
2) The clock becomes low, the inverter driving the clock signal of the slave turns the slave latch on, and it reads the value on the master's output, latching on to it.
3) The (wrong) information is stored.

The net effect that in the second scenario should give a low output in the SR FF because during that one high clock cycle, the input went low, but the master latch already mistakenly latched the high value, and as a result passed this mistake down to the slave latch.


How can this problem be solved? Using a D FF.


The D FF, unlike the SR FF, is edge triggered, which means it only reads input on a rising or falling clock edge (unlike the SR FF which read input as long as the clock was high, resulting in it not reading anymore values once the master latched once). The edge trigger property of the D FF means even if an input changes during a clock cycle, it doesn't matter since the D FF only considered the value at the clock edge.


Seraph said:
im really confused at the complement Of Q as well , sure it serves as an input value in the Flip Flop but other than that , what is its purpose?
Q and Qbar? These are outputs! Q is what you would expect your output to be. Qbar is the negation of Q, which in most cases is just a by product of the FF/latch circuit itself, which is sometimes useful.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:

Zeratool

New Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
2
Sorry i have a question it sort of relates to circuits so i thought i might as well ask it here

for a designer of a circuit to protect a circuit "design" , what would be the best to use? a patent or copyright?? and why?
i really dont know the two terms seem very similar to me...
thanks
 

sunny

meh.
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
5,350
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Lets get several things straight:

  • copyright - protects the expression or form of expression
  • patent - protects the idea / concept / system

If you are protecting your new and unique circuit, I would use a patent - this should ensure that circuit's function and main idea is protected.
 

Zeratool

New Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
2
what does it mean by form of expression, does that mean how my circuit has been designed? is protected?
because to protect my design wouldnt this be the best method? (note it is only a design , not an actual circuit)
maybe not , but can you just clarify form of expression
 

sunny

meh.
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
5,350
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Zeratool said:
what does it mean by form of expression, does that mean how my circuit has been designed? is protected?
because to protect my design wouldnt this be the best method? (note it is only a design , not an actual circuit)
maybe not , but can you just clarify form of expression
The copyright would only protect the way that you've expressed the circuit on the piece of paper, and your description is protected. However, the idea by which you used in the circuit to achieve in your goal is not protected.

Then I guess in this case it really depends on what circuit the question is talking about. Do you want to protect a new and unique design you've created and you want to protect that design and its ideas? Or just the way you've solved a particular problem?

US Patent Office said:
For example, a description of a machine could be copyrighted, but this would only prevent others from copying the description; it would not prevent others from writing a description of their own or from making and using the machine.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top