China to Bush: Stay out of our affairs (1 Viewer)

Iron

Ecclesiastical Die-Hard
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
7,765
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Friendly slap?
Must have a ring with the seal of the president
 

HNAKXR

Wooooooo...OOOoOOOOoOOoP!
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
296
Location
safe
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Slidey said:
Somebody tell me who's troll this is. I can't figure it out yet and I refuse to accept somebody is both that conservative and that stupid (even though, I've met such people in real life, it's too depressing to contemplate).
go south the Mason-Dixon line

all you can eat conservative bullshit.
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Dongle said:
In terms of a country's sovereignty, retard. Not an individual's.
chinese nationalists are way better than muslims on bos
 

bigboyjames

Banned
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
1,265
Location
aus
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
jb_nc said:
chinese nationalists are way better than muslims on bos
retard speaks again. when was being a Muslim nationalistic? fucking dim wit.
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
lol, can't see your post. oh well, sure your gem of wisdom descended down from thebes.
 

HNAKXR

Wooooooo...OOOoOOOOoOOoP!
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
296
Location
safe
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
it is possible to be both.

there is an estimated 23 million +
population of Muslims in china
 

withoutaface

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2004
Messages
15,098
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Miles Edgeworth said:
You see great glorious motherland china kills them for their convenience!
Them and Optus are clearly in cahoots.
 

pandaish

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
9
Location
up in the cloud
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
http://www.anti-cnn.com/

Miles Edgeworth said:
You see great glorious motherland china kills them for their convenience!
Seriously how would you know? Have you ever lived in China before? When you don't even understand the Chinese culture what gives you the right to critise them? Don't base your opinion just because you are annoyed at China for being one of the most important nations or from the ridiculous information you get from western media.

Aryanbeauty said:
America, as the one and only superpower and the world's richest country with a GDP of $ 14 trillion, with its military capability spanning all corners of the globe and its mighty economy without which the world can't function, has every right to interfere in chinese internal affairs or any other country for that matter.
So? don't give china all these crap about freedom of speech and religion when America is locking all these ppl in guantanamo prison without trials. Just because America is the "mighty economy" (as you said, which won't be true any more from 2012) doesn't give america any right to interfere. and really a country lead by Bush who can't even spell properly is it going to get better soon? i don't think so. what an idiot.
 

jb_nc

Google "9-11" and "truth"
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
5,391
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
pandaish is my alt account for trolling.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Why do we care about human rights abuses in China? We never really cared before.

Although, with their growing middle class, they will slowly gain their freedoms. Better that the transition is slow rather than instant like Iraq. Lol.
 

Wassup?

Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2008
Messages
286
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I reckon Americans, Israelites, and the people that have that funny accent in Europe, should do an invasion on the Chinas and kill lot of people. LULZ
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Now that would be quite a bloody war. As long as Australia isn't involved. Europe, East Asia and North America nuke each other and Australia comes out on top. ;)
 

scarybunny

Rocket Queen
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
3,820
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Snaykew said:
Now that would be quite a bloody war. As long as Australia isn't involved. Europe, East Asia and North America nuke each other and Australia comes out on top. ;)

We'll pull a Steve Bradbury on it.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
zimmerman8k said:
So because America has a high proportion of criminals in jails, it isn't really free and has no place talking about freedom?

Part of freedom is having jails to punish those who encroach on other peoples freedoms. Even if the Americans are overzealous in their sentencing this hardly makes the whole country despotic.

Also, it entirely possible that a significant reason for the high incarceration rate is excellent law enforcement which makes their country safer.
It's called mandatory sentencing and taking away the court's power of discretion, which encourages repeat offenders because they turn into hardened criminals in prison and become distant to society. Some people don't need to goto gaol to be detered from reoffending. So no, it's not due to excellent law enforcement, its due to politicians who want to seem tough on crime so they throw everyone in prison who are first time offenders.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
zimmerman8k said:
Oh I agree they are over the top. But having a decent police force is still probably a factor. I'd still rather live in American than most corrupt and virtually lawless states. At least part of the figures are because more criminals are caught than in alot of other countries.
Best argument ever. I'D RATHER LIVE IN A COUNTRY WITH LAW THAN A COUNTRY WITHOUT LAW.

Miles Edgeworth said:
Simple question, where would you rather live:

America or China?
Australia.
 

ari89

MOSSAD Deputy Director
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
2,618
Location
London
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
ari89 said:
Can someone please explain to me what the US correctional system has to do with offshore human rights abuses?

Anyone?
.
 

Snaykew

:)
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
538
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
zimmerman8k said:
Yeah ok, that added nothing to my argument. But what you've done is focused on what is just a red herring rather than addressing the rest of my argument which did make sense.
I didn't have a problem with it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top