Centripetal force (1 Viewer)

rama_v

Active Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
1,151
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
The statement is incorrect. The tyres provide the centripetal force required to sustain the ciruclar motion. Without a force acting inwards the car would just be travelling in a straight line, at a tangent to the circle.

Also since the car is changing velocity (its direction is changing), this means it is accelerating. Hence Newton's second Law F = ma states that when an object is accelerating, it is experiencing a force. In this case, F = ma but a = v2/r
So The net force on the car is F = mv2/r ...Just sub in the numbers - this proves that there is a net force acting on the car.

This website was of paticular help to me in understanding th concepts described above:
http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/circles/u6l1c.html
 
Last edited:

darkwarrior2

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
52
Location
happy hardcore
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
thanks

so basically there is no need for balancing of any forces, because i was confused in thinking that there was a force acting to the right of the car, outward and that i needed to balance these two forces.
so just show that Centripetal force IS the net force acting on the car and that the friction of the tyres + road provides this centripetal force. thanks
 

rama_v

Active Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
1,151
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
There is only one force acting on the car (ignoring gravity - its balanced by the normal reaction force). It is the centripetal force provided by the car's tyres, that acts inwards towards the centre of the roundabout.

Whenever forces are unbalanaced there must be an acceleration of some sort occurring. In this case the acceleration is centripetal

EDIT: Thanks Helper :)
 
Last edited:

helper

Active Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
1,183
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Velocity is not a force.
In the answer you have given, remove the friction the car will continue forward due to Inertia. Inertia is not a force. Newton's 1st Law is what you are describing.

If velocity was a force, then its units would be Newton's and the result would be as you said it would accelerate, which it doesn't if you remove the friction.
 

rama_v

Active Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
1,151
Location
Western Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
helper said:
Velocity is not a force.
In the answer you have given, remove the friction the car will continue forward due to Inertia. Inertia is not a force. Newton's 1st Law is what you are describing.

If velocity was a force, then its units would be Newton's and the result would be as you said it would accelerate, which it doesn't if you remove the friction.
ooopps
will change it lol
I better read up on forces again
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top