Catholic Trials - What did u think? (1 Viewer)

[Viceroy]

i thought it was crap....... all the topics that i studied were tested more in the MC than the SA. and what i didnt study was all in there........

well at least its over!!!

 

[Christine]

i did well i think. the extended responses were a bit dodgy tho....

 

[blake]

Yeah, we studied only 2 religious rites, from 2 religious traditions...and when it asked for all religious rites in a religious tradition, i was a bit stunned about what else I should write :/

How much were your extended responses?

 

[p00_p00]

FUCK THAT EXTENDED RESPONSE WAS SCREWED!

I stuffed up the ENTIRE exam!
I forgot what the hell pluralism is....
I had 2 make up shit like.... it has been accelerated by the reduction in sectarinism and increased emphasis on ecumenrial (or whateva it is).

But hey its Religion!

 

[Christine]

for religous rites it didn't want to know all the rites for all the traditions i think it was just a general question...

i only wrote about an average of 2 and a bit pages for the ext responses

 

[bex]

i thought it was a bit crazed!! the wording of the 3rd part of each ext response?! ARGH! put me totally off... but on the whole i think it was a good test of our abilities i just hope the HSC exam is worded a lot better!

 

[Missngel]

i thought it was pretty crap!!!
But to tell u the truth i dont care i wasnt expecting to get a good mark neway weve done sht all in religion this year!!!
Why does it have to be cumpolsery??

 

[blake]

Haha, I did like 2 pages for Religion and ethics and 2 pages for Religious rites :/

 

[jenster]

Originally posted by blake
Haha, I did like 2 pages for Religion and ethics and 2 pages for Religious rites :/

wow someone who does my electives!

...so did i, but i didn't really study so i suppose i will deserve my bad mark.

about the relg rites question, you did only have to do 2 relg rites in 2 traditions... not in general... except for a)

 

[Viceroy]

yea but jenny ur the greatest (no sarcasim intended)

 

[dansnation]

i think that exam decided my 1 unit to be ommitted.. i didnt go well init at all

 

[Mistress Lilith]

It wasn't all that bad. It could've been a hell of a lot worse...

 

[blake]

Originally posted by Mistress Lilith
It wasn't all that bad. It could've been a hell of a lot worse...

Could have been a hell alot easier too

 

[Jenn]

yeah i didnt think it was Too Too bad... i mean we still had time to sit and look at other ppl
but yeah... y did u guys have to do 2 electives for?
we only had to do one....
yup pluralism.. just crapped on about that too lol

 

[blake]

Didnt write anything on pluralism

I had to do 2 electives, plus more which my school stuck in

 

[Mistress Lilith]

Originally posted by blake


Could have been a hell alot easier too

No, I really don't think it could've been easier? I thought it was pretty straight forward, right out of the syllabus.
If you took each syllabus point as a question, there was no way you could've gone wrong?

 

[blake]

I can't remember the exam, wait a week and then I'll state my reasons

 

[jenster]

ok exams can always ALWAYS be easier

...and yeah i know i'm the greatest viceroy... the greatest bludger that is!

 

[lappang]

The studies of Religion 1 CSSA trials was a joke it was so bloody easy and straight forward!!!!!
I thought that the teachers and interpreters question was the one i seriously stuffed it up and i got like 19/20 the = highest mark in that section for both one and two unit
btw i got 45/50 so you can see why i thought the exam was a sinch. All you had to do is learn your work!!!

 

[blake]

Yep, the exam was easy, but was marked very hard.