Thats what I think....One of the worst structured exams ever. The way students were deceived in lecture 13 is just crazy. Including 3 questions on Proposition 1 is just unbelievable..... No npv, no dividend policy, no MM 2 3, no IRR.... like what was told. ? ....
STUPID LIC SAID THERE WILL BE 70% theory, WHAT FUCK WHERE IS IT???????
THE EXAM STRUCTURE WAS A TOTALLY PIECE OF SHIT,
Like STAT170 if we can get 55/120 in the final I think we can get a PC/Pass overall.Oh mate I agree, most of my friends are 100% they failed. Only hope I am having at the moment is the scaling system.
Like STAT170 if we can get 55/120 in the final I think we can get a PC/Pass overall.
Omg, I forgot 2 answer a three mark part, forwent all 12 marks related 2 the fucking SML graphs and 10 marks of question 5. At least 25 easy marks forgone. The exam itself was not sucked hard but all the misleading information and the structure (2 many parts were related 2 the other) would kill students. U forgot 1 small part and got shit 4 many others.
It may be the case if u have 43-44% (not 42% or lower coz I had a m8 in the situation) in the final exam. With a good assessment mark u can get some considerations. Just talk to the LIC.I have to agree with you Saleh... The structure wass really bad and no balance at all (every topic).. I only most 45 or 50 out of 120... do you think they will look our mid exam, attendance, and homework as well ? (as consideration) hopefully they will..
I have to agree with you Saleh... The structure wass really bad and no balance at all (every topic).. I only most 45 or 50 out of 120... do you think they will look our mid exam, attendance, and homework as well ? (as consideration) hopefully they will..