If people try but can't get the marks they could talk to this dude... http://blogs.smh.com.au/newsblog/archives/freedom_of_information/index.html
A bit of media pressure perhaps?
My theory is that they stuffed up the dates and didn't really mean 18th and 19th. I think UAIs were out by those dates last year but not this year.
In the end, it comes down to UAIs. Without them they can't exactly call and offer places.
Or yes, we're all gerbils in an experiment. :P
depends on the number of people who do the course. With 9200 ish students, the top 10 places are reported (over 10000 = 20 places, Less than 1000 people = top 5 places are reported)
Actually, Schumann committed suicide at the end of his life. :P
As for the issue at hand, I'll just echo what politik said. Would they have printed the story for 11 months of the year? I don't think so.... although now that I'm a Frontline watching, media savvy graduate of the...
Oh, I don't know. Understanding strange requirements, using only the authority-endorsed terminology, being able to write bullshit and thinking inside the box seem like perfect qualities of military officers.
>:P
The question as I understood it refered to Equal Employment Opportunity, you had to talk about how the new structure had to be fair to everyone and not biased.
That's the only thing that makes sense given the (largely crap) syllabus and the (often poorly worded) past papers.
I thought it was really straightforward in the Industry section, and I didn't have to bullshit too much. Equity is the question I'm least confident about, I'm pretty sure I repeated myself.
Multimedia was so very easy, though the scanners threw some people. The one instance where I felt glad...