I had so much trouble deciding whether or not to talk about criminal responsibility. I thought it was just a context sentence for the quote by the NSW attorney general bc without it, the quote would have been pretty random. I didn't talk about criminal responsibility bc i have absolutely no law...
I’m pretty sure recursive induction is ext 2 only, and the syllabus says it’s only first order recursive formulae where that’s a second order recursive so I don’t think that’s necessary to know, even for ext 2
true. Now that i think about it my examples of separation of children and property, as well as dv and divorce all have courts in them so i would just talk about them ig
they haven't assessed international crime since 2015 i believe and don't remember when they last assessed young offenders. They are both easily assessable from the syllabus and they have done the investigation process in recent years but it's all a mystery :(
I think for crime it will be either international law or young offenders
For my options (consumers, family) I'm hoping for marketing and advertising, and domestic violence
Your thoughts?