Recent content by JJPH

Ancient History: 88 English Advanced: 82 Maths: 90 Physics: 78 Software Development Design: 92 Studies of Religion 1: 44

But didn't it state Religious RITES? Hence plural? Hence 2+?

Did the question require us to write about one religious rite, or two religious rites?

pwned. sect. III 17 pgs sect. IV 15 pgs

pwnage.

what is it about? n what economic issues does this theory affect?

crime fiction essay: 34 pages creative: 36 pages fully pwned it mate :) btw: neone notice trend that this yr all exams have been easier than previous? watch out eco, sor n chem...major pwnage is awaiting

Xachro: Well who to refer to, Excel or BOS? adgala: Well that's stupid enough for BOS to not list it in the document? Or..? (cause i know some text books refer to a structure diagram as a chart or something, i forget)

I wrote, "This is not in the syllabus" (hoping my memory served me right in the exam) and then i just drew one anyway. Came home today, and did a search through the syllabus for "context diagram". And it's not there. Someone correct me if i'm wrong here, but its in the IPT syllabus, but not...

Yes, i got a negative as well. It asked u to evaluate, not find area. I can't remember what my answer was exactly, but yea, negative :)

It was alright I didnt like 9 and 10 And yes i felt like i was killing up time, i didnt feel that it was enough time either, but meh.

I'm not talking about the square with the triangle and shit. There was a PART a to question 10 which was on the previous page before that square/triangle crap. It was a simpsons rule question. I didnt do the square/triangle thing

What was the actual question, im pretty blurred out. Something to do with K, parabola and not intersecting 2x - 1 or something?

it was moderate, everything up to 9/10 was just out the window you should have been able to do part a of question 10? it was a simpsons rule question

90-100 because i lost 18 marks from missed questions