Recent content by Flick

Hmm, well I finally found out what my assessment ranks were and let's just say I have Buckleys chance of getting into what I wanna do (eg. Arts/law at UNSW, Syd U or UTS). As for the solution to an insufficient UAI: Tafe is not an option for me, I'm so totally over tafe!!! I'd do a...

Closing the threads after a period of time is a good idea, but maybe a month after the first person posts would be better for those ppl that like to take their time when reading. However, it'd only work if we had a set book to read, otherwise ppl would just read different books at the same time...

That's a very good point, I didn't think of that! :o I'm pretty sure we have quite a variety of different tastes on this board, but there probably is a majority one on here. Ok, so scrapping the first idea, what about setting a genre every however often (say 3 weeks or so) and putting up a...

Hi there everyone, I'm so glad we have this new section, thanks Laz! Nice to know I'm not the only bookworm around here...:D Just wanted to air an idea for choosing books on the "reading list". I've noticed a couple of ppl saying that they aren't too fond of "classics" (and I must say...

Beginning of year: 5 boys, 5 girls End of year: 2 boys, 5 girls All 5 of us girls sat the exam, only 2 guys did the HSC exam tho (2 dropped out, 1 wasn't going for his UAI or Record of Achievement) Hey, I know it's a bit OT, but does anyone know if someone drops out after the rankings...

I think I ended up leaving most of Q. 26 blank and the net income one as well. Gonna fail, not happy Jan.

You might find it easy, but I definitely don't! Hence the reason I'm doing general....I don't think it's fair if they (BOS) scale down the marks of general too much, I'm sure others doing general would agree, if we were smart enough to do 2 unit or higher we would have been stuck in those...

I think it should be fine as long as you numbered each question clearly and wrote what question you were answering on the covers.....:)

Umm, something tells me I got very confused right about here.....isn't the 68% below 1 s.d. (and above -1 s.d.)??? Arrgghhh, so confused!!! Gonna go over this while I have a ciggie....(maybe I'll be hit by a flash of brilliance? If not, I guess lighting would do....:D)

By all means, jump right in! (*Skips back to board, grabs Lundy by the arm and waltzes off singing merrily.....* I think I should stop looking at this board for a while, the fact that I haven't looked anything up but seem to know how to do stuff has convinced me that my brain found the "off"...

Eeep, sorry, my bad.....I really do think I need new glasses, do you think that would count for special consideration? LOL (Skips off singing: *I'm gonna fail, I'm gon-na fa-il*)

I got $15 for this one, 'cause the car was parked for 2 1/2 hrs, not 2hrs Darn, got this wrong too, but I know for a fact that if its a normal distribution anything within a standard deviation of 1 makes up 68%.....the answer would have been 21% Kinda hard to explain, I'll do a sideways...

For (c) I got 28.....can I see your working for that?

Oh damn! I really have to get my eyes checked, lousy tricksy ppls! Didn't see the asterixs on #9, but I can give you the correct working for it anyways.... (1.29+7.23+4.13) = 12.65 12.65/110 (coz the 10% GST is included) =0.115x10 =$1.15

Yep, I didn't realise we needed to take her 1st job into account, oh well. At least I got the other two points (for iv) I just assumed that the ppl who wrote the paper were right about her net income (otherwise what would be the point? LOL) and used that number.