NESA is pushing an aboriginal agenda - apparently aboriginals did mathematical and physical analysis to design a mudhut before the stolen generations (1 Viewer)

C

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,272
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
STEM subject btw. All our ancestors were engineers, so why aren't other nations getting fucking history shoved down their throats in a science subject?
Why do we have to pander to 3% (I don't think aboriginal people even asked to be represented in a STEM syllabus, probably some retarded nose ring left-winger virtue signaling)
1762669489783.png
 
Last edited:
C

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,272
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A

please "have your say" and say that aboriginal regurgitation bs doens't fucking belong in the subject "engineering studies" seriously

This is getting out of hand - nobody fucking asked for this besides a bunch of blue haired nose ring kamala supporters who cried that trump won (we're in australia btw)
 
Last edited:
C

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,272
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Seriously

nesa.qualtrics.com

'Have your say' survey – Agriculture, Agriculture Life Skills and Engineering Studies 11–12

The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.
nesa.qualtrics.com
1762670207706.png

"removal of peripheral content" aka removal of content we deemed toooo advanced so we could fit in the useless garbage aboriginal crap

please have your say on this dogshit syllabus. I didn't manage to fill in this survey for physics (tho i wish I did)
 
Last edited:
C

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,272
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
totally_screwed said:
who cares man
you're acting like an entire module was allocated for aboriginal study, it's a few dot points
try to appreciate why the inclusion is being made
Click to expand...
These dot points aren't even factual.

Plus 10 dot points equivalent to 10 pages of content, is not what I'd call "a few"

Aboriginals DID not fucking think like engineers. Nor did they apply any form of "engineer thinking"

Just cause you build mudhuts and what not, that literally doesn't make you like an engineer.
 
Last edited:
flummi

flummi

youll get over it
Joined
Aug 15, 2024
Messages
117
Location
vyvanse abuser & citations hater
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
coolcat6778 said:
These dot points aren't even factual.

Aboriginals DID not fucking think like engineers. Nor did they apply any form of "engineer thinking"

Just cause you build mudhuts and what not, that literally doesn't make you like an engineer.
Click to expand...
they were just utilising what they had, by that logic it would mean that everyones ancestors were engineers. so why isnt the rest of the world having their history shoved down their throats in non historical subjects?
 
C

coolcat6778

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2024
Messages
2,272
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Also 10 dot points on pure aboriginal regurgitation doesn't seem like a lot, until you learn that this is all from a syllabus (which is inherently brief)

There's more stuff NESA expects you to know with 10 dot points. You're going to have to regurgitate like 10 whole pages worth of words just on this useless crap btw.

Basically 10 whole fucking pages on useless garbage. Useful stuff like angular momentum and what not could've been learnt with the 10 pages wasted

which is basically 5000 words you're expected to read assuming 500 words per page (on useless fucking bullshit that wont benefit university engineering study at all)

5000 words is already enough to learn the entirety of rotational mechanics, a topic which was in the pre 2000s engineering hsc syllabus
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top