Hi.
Our half yearly is based on the 2006 paper, with the Fish analogy (facts are like fish, not lain on a board on display @ shop but floating in the sea etcetc), with discussion on four historians and focusing on how Motive and Context "make" history.
I have no idea what kind of angles I can take, as my 'historians' are scientists and philosphers... how would I argue they are historians?
cheers for any help
Our half yearly is based on the 2006 paper, with the Fish analogy (facts are like fish, not lain on a board on display @ shop but floating in the sea etcetc), with discussion on four historians and focusing on how Motive and Context "make" history.
I have no idea what kind of angles I can take, as my 'historians' are scientists and philosphers... how would I argue they are historians?
cheers for any help