integration problemssss (1 Viewer)

Constip8edSkunk

Joga Bonito
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
2,397
Location
Maroubra
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by ToO LaZy ^*
umm...but how?
d(sin^2 x)dx =2sinxcosx = sin2x

Originally posted by ToO LaZy ^*
anywho...i got one last integration problem
you can do it by parts where you integrate 1 and differentiate the log but theres probably a better way.
 

Constip8edSkunk

Joga Bonito
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
2,397
Location
Maroubra
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
ok since the top is the derivative of the bottom then you can just integrate so it equals a log?
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by ToO LaZy ^*
:confused:
d/dx [ln f(x)]=f'(x)/f(x) Hence the integral of k*f'(x)/f(x)=k*ln f(x) +C (where k is a constant and C is the constant of integration)
 
Last edited:

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
All you've done is let u = Sin<sup>2</sup>[x] and reduced the integral down to (2 + u)<sup>-1</sup>

I just bypassed that step saying the thing to be integrated is of the form (Derivative of Function)/(Function)
Which integrates to Ln[Function] + C
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
And because I love doing integration by parts, because substitution is inferior and crap, here's the last integral by parts (i.e. the hard/long way):

Let S denote the integrate sign:

I = SLn[x<sup>2</sup> - 1]dx
u = Ln[x<sup>2</sup> - 1]
u' = 2x/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
v' = 1
v = x

:. I = xLn[x<sup>2</sup> - 1] - S(2x<sup>2</sup>/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1))dx
= xLn[x<sup>2</sup> - 1] - S(2 + 2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1))dx
= xLn[x<sup>2</sup> - 1] - S(2 - 1/(x + 1) + 1/(x - 1))dx ***
= xLn[x<sup>2</sup> - 1] - 2x + Ln[x + 1] - Ln[x - 1] + C

W00t, go integration by parts, the superior method.

*** Note to readers, just think about it, you've got to know how to split up partial fractions of the form k/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1) and kx/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1) quickly, it's an easy method to learn
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
2,907
Location
northern beaches
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Originally posted by Xayma
d/dx [ln f(x)]=f'(x)/f(x) Hence the integral of k*f'(x)/f(x)=k*ln f(x) +C (where k is a constant and C is the constant of integration)
Originally posted by KeypadSDM
All you've done is let u = Sin<sup>2</sup>[x] and reduced the integral down to (2 + u)<sup>-1</sup>

I just bypassed that step saying the thing to be integrated is of the form (Derivative of Function)/(Function)
Which integrates to Ln[Function] + C
ohhh....you got me all confused...i thought you were doing the last question i posted..
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by ToO LaZy ^*
ohhh....you got me all confused...i thought you were doing the last question i posted..
I think parts is the only way to do it, the substitutions I was using got stupidly hard.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
2,907
Location
northern beaches
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Originally posted by KeypadSDM

:. I = xLn[x2 - 1] - S(2x2/(x2 - 1))dx
= xLn[x2 - 1] - S(2 + 2/(x2 - 1))dx
= xLn[x2 - 1] - S(2 - 1/(x + 1) + 1/(x - 1))dx ***
what method did you use to split the fraction?
 
Last edited:

Teoh

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
150
Umm
The first part is just isolating the two, so IF you actually put it over the denominator, you would end up with 2x<sup>2</sup>/x<sup>2</sup> -1
Although, I don't really know how to spot these kind of things yet :(
The second part is partial fractions
2 -=- (forgot the word...similar???) a(x-1) + b(x+1)

To get the -1 and + 1

I THINK :):)
Feel free to ridicule for sillyness
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
2x<sup>2</sup>/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)

For this step, it's really quite simple, and if you want to do well in integration REMEMBER IT!

2x<sup>2</sup>/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= (2x<sup>2</sup> - 2 + 2)/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= 2(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1) + 2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= 2 + 2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)

The next bit is not so obvious, however, after you've done about 50,000,000 problems, it becomes VERY obvious.

2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= - 1/(x + 1) + 1/(x - 1)

This can be checked very easily, but the method?

Do the check, you'll see the method. Remember how the -1 multiplies with the (x - 1), and the 1 multiplies with the (x + 1).

This makes the x's cancel out when adding (opposite sign, leaves you with x - x), and the 1's combine when adding (as they have the same sign of +).

Learn when to spot symmetric combinations like this, they are expecially common in past papers where the polynomial on the bottom of the fraction contains x<sup>2n</sup> - k<sup>2n</sup>.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
2,907
Location
northern beaches
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Originally posted by KeypadSDM
2x<sup>2</sup>/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)

For this step, it's really quite simple, and if you want to do well in integration REMEMBER IT!

2x<sup>2</sup>/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= (2x<sup>2</sup> - 2 + 2)/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= 2(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1) + 2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)
= 2 + 2/(x<sup>2</sup> - 1)

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...now i get it
when i do the 'not so obvious bit' i split the fraction using A + B....
but hopefully, it'll 'click in' once i've had enough practice.
thx champ..ur da best....literally..:p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top