Forces between two parallel charged rods (1 Viewer)

NexusRich

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
87
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Can someone please explain what role does the permeability of free space play in the formula of Forces between two parallel charged rods?
 

tito981

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
326
Location
Orange
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
its just a constant of proportionality, it doesnt really mean much in highschool physics but im sure its derived from somewhere, i think maybe maxwell cause its in his speed of light formula.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,644
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
There are usually reasons why these constants are interrelated but the reasons may be beyond HSC level. Things also changed in 2018 / 2019 with the SI redefinitions. Prior to the redefinition, had an exact value:


This arose from the definition of the ampere as the constant current that, when maintained between two straight parallel conductors (of infinite length and negligible circular cross section) placed 1 meter apart in vacuum, produces a force per unit length between them of equal to . Applying this definition to Ampère's force law gives in exact terms. Having this as exact was necessary for the definition of the amp as the unit for current.

However, with the redefinitions came many subtle changes and the reasons for these are really not worth exploring at HSC level. The ampere is now defined in terms of the elementary charge and the second (both now fixed in value). As a consequence, is no longer a fixed constant, it now has an experimentally derived value with a measurement uncertainty. One recent report gave it as


Note that the value has remained unchanged for the first nine significant figures and so the difference is irrelevant for many applications.

Units and constants are often interrelated, with being related to the fine-structure constant by the equation


with being the Planck constant, being the speed of light, and being the elementary charge. Since these three now have fixed / defined values, it is only and that are variable and experimentally derived, and hence the uncertainty in is determined by the uncertainty in our measurements of the fine-structure constant.

The changes that accompanied the 2019 redefinitions touched on all our fundamental units and are covered unevenly in textbooks. The definitions are not necessarily intuitive for a non-specialist. For example, the kilogram is no longer defined by a prototype object against which comparisons can be made. It is now (effectively) that mass that, when combined with the definitions of the metre and the second, gives the Planck constant the exact value .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top