-
Looking for HSC notes and resources? Check out our Notes & Resources page
BEco/Bcom ---> law (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter aditya
- Start date
...
^___^
HI NEWBIE!!!
...
^___^
i've only been posting in some threads
eh, uni took the best out of me (along with coles) so yea
Suvat
part timer
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2003
- Messages
- 645
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
I've already done a case assignment and it seemed to be much easier, extracting the ratios and stuff, maybe its just because I don't know how to start the essay 
Btw, does anyone here know what customary international law is (or customary law in general) and whether it's considered natural law or positive law?
Btw, does anyone here know what customary international law is (or customary law in general) and whether it's considered natural law or positive law?
oi professor, is coles treating you especially well or something? find a cruisey job with decent working hours!
whoa, how great will the holidays be.. no carry over work!
NEWBIE!!! should i go to unsw next year or drop out and become a rock star?? usyd is so meh. or maybe it's just uni in general.
whoa, how great will the holidays be.. no carry over work!
NEWBIE!!! should i go to unsw next year or drop out and become a rock star?? usyd is so meh. or maybe it's just uni in general.
MoonlightSonata
Retired
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2002
- Messages
- 3,645
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
no newbie u fool!
what the hell haven't you been listening to mehera at all
right of action --> whether you have a cause for the claim you are bringing, which might include assault, negligence, breach of contract, conversion, etc
for eg. "dacking" is not a cause of action
what the hell haven't you been listening to mehera at all
right of action --> whether you have a cause for the claim you are bringing, which might include assault, negligence, breach of contract, conversion, etc
for eg. "dacking" is not a cause of action
Last edited:
Newbie
is a roflcopter
- Joined
- May 17, 2003
- Messages
- 3,670
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
darhghgh
its all too confusing
gault goes LETS MAKE A RIGHT OF ACTION FOR PRIVACY
but then he puts the whole bit into the heading Elements of the Tort
and damn those two dissenting dudes, especially anderson who just talked randomly for 10 paragraphs.
ahh mehara, please give me something more than zero for class participation
its all too confusing
gault goes LETS MAKE A RIGHT OF ACTION FOR PRIVACY
but then he puts the whole bit into the heading Elements of the Tort
and damn those two dissenting dudes, especially anderson who just talked randomly for 10 paragraphs.
ahh mehara, please give me something more than zero for class participation
MoonlightSonata
Retired
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2002
- Messages
- 3,645
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
Yeh Gault P says that there should be a cause of action for invasion of privacy, then he goes on to say what elements would need to be satisfied in such an action.
I know its annoying - I get the image of Anderson J being some old waspy conservative dude. But they are making clear that freedom of expression is really important
...you should put this in another thread...
Just to clarify on those previous comments... the existence of the tort itself gives rise to a right of action.
A tortious act on the part of the defendant then allows the plaintiff to pursue that right of action.
I've been trying to think of an analogy... the tort creates a (closed) doorway, which is a right of action in potentio. The tortious act opens the doorway, allowing the right of claim to pass through. Where there is no tort, it doesn't matter whether the doorway is open or closed, because there's no doorway to begin with - and hence no right of action (under tort law).
A tortious act on the part of the defendant then allows the plaintiff to pursue that right of action.
I've been trying to think of an analogy... the tort creates a (closed) doorway, which is a right of action in potentio. The tortious act opens the doorway, allowing the right of claim to pass through. Where there is no tort, it doesn't matter whether the doorway is open or closed, because there's no doorway to begin with - and hence no right of action (under tort law).