Recent content by Urgh

yeah no it just told me 98.8 when other calcs say 89... its broken, or at least it is for me

<tbody style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "> 2 Economics 84/100 86/100 85 5 2 English (Advanced) 82/100 82/100 82 5 1 English Extension 1 46/50 45/50 46 E4 2 Legal...

the current is independent, but its not a variable mate... the distance is the only thing that is varied according to what the question gives, the rod was placed at different distances < variable not reliant on the other factors, check and mate sherlock holmes

dude, the repulsive force is dependent on current and distance, its a dependent variable... the independent variable is what you change to affect the experiment, hence distance between

"rod a was placed at different distances from rod b". its distance between

with 14 would there be eddy currents generated? cause i assumed the split meant no induced current so did D :S

observer across the street can see length contraction...

same, i still reckon they should get rid of 19 cause then thats a 18/19 for me :)

there are other methods the police have power to arrest a person if: they believe that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime they witness a person committing a crime they have an arrest warrant for that person

thats not my argument... my argument is the wording of the question "Which of the following is a legal power that police have"... they can do any fuckin thing, it should be asking for what theyre most likely to do

Lou is suspected by the police of having stolen a car. Which of the following is a legal power that police have when they approach Lou? a. arrest him b. fingerprint him c. require him to answer questions d. require him to go to the police station

19. it merely says what do the police have the legal power to do. it doesnt ask what they should or will do. it asks what they can do, and all are legitimate answers. they can require anyone to answer questions without arresting them as i said before, i.e. identification.

if a police officer came up to me and asked for age and address, im required by law to show it and identification to prove it under law enforcement (powers and responsibilities) act. didn't think i'd be referencing legislation again for a long time...

um you can require someone to answer questions before arresting them. They can request name and address as well as proof of identity and all that shit. And for the robbery question, conspiracy is a preliminary crime only put forward if you dont actually do it... Have you ever heard of someone...

I just reckon BOS needs to lift their game and stop giving us this vague trash. Be specific so we can actually show knowledge of content instead of fucked up thought processes.