I finally get it now. Scorch, I would say is the most intellegent person in this thread - he has the decency to give logical and scientific explainations for things. For those who do follow religion, if you do have to put so much effort in defending your illogical God then odds are he doesn't...
Dude wtf are you on about Okham's Razor is an argument against God as it suggest that the simplist answer is the best. Wouldn't having no God be simplier? I am applying things which I have learnt in stats and science not Okham's Razor.
Actually from my understanding of science, it is more scientific because you are able to measure chance quantitatively through probability and thus you are able to 'test' a given null hypothesis.
Yes, but we are talking about science here. Probability over possibility. Like my lecturer said -...
Yeah see that is what I do not get, what I am saying is that you have to consider the probability of it happening by chance vs. the probability that it did not occur by chance and because the two options are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, if it is improbable that it did occur by...
Guys I don't want to be eaten in this thread. I am agnostic leaning towards Atheism but there are a few issues I do not get. If you guys can help me that would be great :)
1. Issue about intelligent design - When I was studying statistics, my lecturer was talking about probability... If a you...
I think the main issue is how much you and society values prestige! If you value prestige then obviously UWS is not for you. If society values prestige then it will most likely have a 'domino effect' which attracts higher cohort of students and staff. If society values prestige then employers...
Need help guys! I'm having a little trouble understanding this concept.
Is there conflict that arises with achieving both economic growth and distribution of incomes? If so why or why not???/