For: will regulate and standardise human rights, making them domestically enforceable which they are not under international law.
Against: basic human rights protection already provided by legislation/noninterference etc and a document may be flawed by its interpretative nature.
QUESTION...
Thank you so much, melsc. I was just getting into that "Oh shit I'm about to fail, my life is over, I want to die" state of mind when I read this. I can't quite put my gratitude into words, but it's very very there. This is my last exam and I feel thoroughly unprepared. People keep telling me to...
From what I hear it's definitely a good idea...it gives your statements credence. I think you have to if you want top marks. If you just couldn't be bothered, though, fair enough. ^^