Germany (1 Viewer)

jonorosie

New Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
5
Location
St Ives, Sydney
I also did the Weimar one. i structured my arguement around Hitler's rise to power. so i included structual flaws in constitution, left/right wing, depression, conservative elites, cultural differences... Anyone know if this is alright?
 

Candypants

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
142
Location
Wonderland
I did the war question. I had studied a LOT on military defeat and collapse of Nazism because they've never gone near that area. And it paid off.

I was able to relate Battle of SGrad very well, too.
 

Acid

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2003
Messages
602
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
jonorosie said:
I also did the Weimar one. i structured my arguement around Hitler's rise to power. so i included structual flaws in constitution, left/right wing, depression, conservative elites, cultural differences... Anyone know if this is alright?
That's basically identical to what I did...
 

Samiwami

New Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
16
Location
Newcastle, NSW
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
well, i was up shit creek wit out a paddle coz my teacher never mentioned anything about sgrad in class at all!! and she was very quiet about weimar so im guessing maybe a mark of 5???

the teach said she was sure it was gonna be germany as a totalitarian state so thats what she prepared us for.
 

cwilson

New Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
16
weimar was good i wrote on :

- origins of weimar and its subsequent lack of support
- the flaws in the consitution
- the leadership and backdoors intrigues
- the depression and economic crises/unemployment
- How hitler manipulated all of these events to his own advantage

therefore the fall of weimar was not completely due to hitler and the nazi party but they had something ot do with it
 

SuZiE HiGh

SuZiE HiGh
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
6
Location
City campus
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
mod exam

hey i did stalingrad only coz i didnt expect another weimar question 2 yrs in a row thus not preparing for it.. damn.. i had such good historiography for it though. yeh i pretty much did wat u did for stalingrad - excpet i started in 1939 with the war and battle of briatin in 1940 - i ran throguh foriegn policy till 1945 shoing how events/battles contrbuited to the collpase. i said stalingrad was the turn of the tide - and showed how after it germany was on the offensive - but i only wrote 1 paragraph on stalingard coz i said it didnt play the most significnat role - Hitlers leadership did!
cya
 

Butterfly Kissz

i wana go bak to unsw!
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
316
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
i really liked this question.. wasnt too bad..

and the personality part was good. especially on speer, whos questions were quite similar to last yrs!!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top