All Mutation are Harmful (1 Viewer)

Bobcat

Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
170
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
Seeing they didnt define they wanted a cell mutation....is there to be anychance that i get any marks for writting about like physical mutations? :D
 

flipsyde

Shutup!...that's why
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
1,123
Location
In Utero
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
I talked about both sides of the issue. Not ALL mutations are harmful, some are benificial in evolution etc etc and some are harmful as they can cause inherited diseases etc
 

Misturi

[Studying...]
Joined
Aug 31, 2003
Messages
2,056
Location
Greater West
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
I agreed and disagreed - after all it did say discuss so l agreed and disagreed.

I said some are harmful while others are not which benefit the organism in some way while others can be deadly and kill the organism e.g. cancer.
 

alien

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
563
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
i talked about how mutations are caused by mutagens, which can be carcinogenic or teratogenic (i can't spell it). so therefore they are harmful. should have discussed it though...
 

malkin86

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
1,266
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
I said being heterozygous for the CF gene gave a greater chance of surviving cholera.. they're codominant.
 

imperfek_anjel

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16
well mutation results in variation in a species so not all are harmful, and in biodiversity, it is actually quite useful for a sudden change in environment or introduction of a disease etc. but mutations such as DNA mutations, eg. down syndrome, arent good, bcos it affects the organism working properly, hence the mutation isnt good. so theres two sides of the coin
 

elizabethmary

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
5
first of all a mutaition leading to a change in base, may just code for the same amino acid in which case it is not bad, it has had in fact no effect on the end produce
and a good mutation can occur.. like sicle cell anemia although it is typically ''bad'' its good for peopel who are in an area with a high susceptibility to malaria..as the red blood cells cant burs or something.. but no i cant think of any actual mutations that are good probably because they have been 'selected for' and are just in the population generally now
 

lukebennett

Happy Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
1,216
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
you could have talked about how they can be vital for the survival of species, by creating variation in a population. this is a good thing to do with mutations
 

queenie

I know what ur thinkin...
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
517
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
i basically said that either: mutations are either have a positive, negative or neutral effect. Eg: organisms that solely rely on mutation for variation are bacteria - that is beneficial for them (look at species such as golden staph). negative if it causes an organism to die, and neutral if the environment does not allow for the mutation to show...

it was only worth a couple of marks anway, i gave likea 7mark answer, but knowing me i prob missed out on a word that woulda gained me a mark so :S
 

notnownotever

PRINCE
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
251
Location
DA GHETTO
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
i mentioned the type of mutations i.e subsitiution, inversion, deletion and wrong selection??/
then i mention about how they cause carcinagen... a mutatiuon that causes cancer and other shit
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top