Search results

was anyone else complete surprised by how they went in engx? i was expecting it to be one of my worst exams, if not the worst, but i ended up getting 49/50 were they marking easy this year?

imo you need texts from diff time periods/cultures/societies etc in order to effectivelly understand how the genre has evolved etc texts that i think are pretty substantial for this are The Spanish Tragedy The Life and Loves of a She Devil The Stars Tennis Balls Whitedevil (didn't use it...

i did frontline and while some ppl stuck to media related texts i decided to branch out- this is what worked for me; -The Crucible (the film directed by Hynter-- good for truth in the judicial system) -1984 (the novel by Orwell -- good for truth in terms of government and politics) -WWI...

i think this is an easy one since basically any text can be used for changing self... however stuff i found was good included angela's ashes (both the book and the film directed by parker) thelma and louise (film directed by ridley scott) educating rita (play by russel--> very, very good!)...

i wrote a short story for the 'creative' question but was so busy writing which module i'd done (revenge tragedy) that i didn't give my story a title how much is that going to screw up my mark?

c'mon yr 11/12s, what are you guys planning to do for your hist x projects?

if i could do it all over- which i never would because i'm not clinically insane- i would have applied myself more consistently yeah last minute cramming works great but i know when i get my marks i'll blame them on all those wasted frees and afternoons in front of the tele

for the class of 2003, anyone considering doing a critical response, i hope the following helps 1) do PLENTY of research. yes this medium does allow you to be creative but you also need to be analytical. since so much of ext 2 is the process you really need to do background work 2) decide...

does anyone know what the natural rate of unemployment is? all i have is that it was 6% for 1999. what is it for 2002?