Recent content by dotwingz

yep perfectly said. Tysm

Exactly true, funnily enough i wrote that on MSO :) Also true. A full career in medicine is med school (6 years) + intern & residency (2 years) + training (5 years plus how many years you slog trying to get onto a training scheme. https://medinav.health.qld.gov.au/ This website has good data...

Great thread on the whole, can vouch for most of the advice. Although you seem to confuse undergrad MBBS, undergrad Bx/MD, and provisional Bx/MD. If your implying a BMedSc/MD at UON or BMed/MD at UNSW is anything less than a MBBS at UAdel or JCU you're wrong. If you're implying that an...

appreciate the (not so) subtle flex for making this useless post. considering the publish high aggregate makrs and you included your 2U marks despite the fact that you know they dont count

Probably not the answer you want to here but stationary/organisation tools is entirely personal preference. Some things work well for some but not others, and its ultimatley about what works best for you. Personally I found having those 240 pages kegi spiral bound books with a different colour...

It would be rare to find someone with both the Success One and STRIVE book because theyre essentially mutually exclusive. However I had the STRIVE Phys & Chem whilst my friend had the Success One Phys & Chem so I would probably say: No of questions: STRIVE for Both Phys & Chem Quality of...

I got like ~240 when I sat it in 2013 and I dont remember finishing it. But I had a fairly high accuracy from years of Kumon at that point

Congratulations to all the all rounders this year and the class of 2019 in general!!!

I forgot, but my friend put down A and had the same answer. So i would say its A.

Typically the band 6 cut off is 83-86. Considering this test was on the easier side, i would say ~86 would be the cut off.

The strongest acid was CF3COOH, and the strongest base was F-. Tbf i only knew that because after a 10h binge of Breaking Bad i decided to look up about hydroflouric acid, and saw that it was weak but corrosive, IIRC i looked it up after the exam and CF3COOH has a pKa of like -0.25, so it is...

That's what I mean about a "most likely" approach. His CAD statement does make sense, but it is not is what is most likely to happen. If they take this approach he is probably looking at a 2 or 3

1. As long as you referenced unemployment and inflation and how the stance helps the reserve bank reach these objectives, what you said was mostly valid about CAD as long as you justified it correctly. However, some markers may disagree and take a "most likely" aproach. I would say maybe a 3/4...

Ive often seen in the sample answers that they accept decimal answers. Im not sure when and why but you might not get that wrong. As for the stance, as long as you justified it well you could probably pick up 2/3 marks.

This is a very important point. Sometimes people get too hung up based on what other people here are saying, this community probably relfects the upper bounds of the HSC cohort