Talk:Main Page
| BikiCrumbs: Main Page |
From Biki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 13:21, 3 February 2006 Without Wings (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 14:09, 3 February 2006 Malkin86 (Talk | contribs) stub list suggestion Next diff → |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| #What are the biggest problems facing new users? How do we overcome them? | #What are the biggest problems facing new users? How do we overcome them? | ||
| #*? | #*? | ||
| + | #*A 'how to edit' (wiki notation) and a style guide would be nice... Although the 'style guide' would really be 'look at another page in the same section, copy-paste the editing, and delete the information in the article and keep the structure' :P - [[User:Malkin86|Malkin86]] 15:09, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| #Scripts? | #Scripts? | ||
| #*Are there any scripts implemented that automatically go through and mark spelling and stubs etc? -JM | #*Are there any scripts implemented that automatically go through and mark spelling and stubs etc? -JM | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
| #** But also for long pages that are no longer stubs and should have the tag removed... -[[user:jm1234567890|jm1234567890]] 19-9-2005 | #** But also for long pages that are no longer stubs and should have the tag removed... -[[user:jm1234567890|jm1234567890]] 19-9-2005 | ||
| #** This doesn't seem easy to do (dynamically anyway). - [[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 05:27, 11 November 2005 (CST) | #** This doesn't seem easy to do (dynamically anyway). - [[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 05:27, 11 November 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | #***It can be done easily enough by adding a [[:Category:Stubs]] to the [[Template:Stub]]. Changing the template should change all the pages with the template to be in the stubs category. - [[User:Malkin86|Malkin86]] 15:09, 3 February 2006 (EST) | ||
| #Time | #Time | ||
| #*The time is set to January 29th presently. [[User:MedNez|MedNez]] 03:19, 21 December 2005 (EST) | #*The time is set to January 29th presently. [[User:MedNez|MedNez]] 03:19, 21 December 2005 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:09, 3 February 2006
A few notes:
- How are we going to split up VCE and HSC?
- I'll create a separate front page for the VCE. Just stick with the HSC for now. - JK
- It is possible to spearate it with the groups like "HSC:maths" "VCE:maths" - JM
- Why are uploads enabled?
- Good question. I'll look into that. - JK
- Sorry Typo "Why aren't uploads enabled?" it would be useful to upload pictures. - JM
- Image uploads now enabled. - JK
- Why don't maths equations work?
- They should now. - JK
- Test:
- What are the biggest problems facing new users? How do we overcome them?
- ?
- A 'how to edit' (wiki notation) and a style guide would be nice... Although the 'style guide' would really be 'look at another page in the same section, copy-paste the editing, and delete the information in the article and keep the structure' :P - Malkin86 15:09, 3 February 2006 (EST)
- Scripts?
- Are there any scripts implemented that automatically go through and mark spelling and stubs etc? -JM
- Possibly. See Special:Maintenance. Might need a list of common misspellings (perhaps from Wikipedia). - JK
- Is it possible to have a special page that lists the stub pages? -jm1234567890 10-9-2005
- This might do what you want: Special:Shortpages - Lazarus 17-09-05
- But also for long pages that are no longer stubs and should have the tag removed... -jm1234567890 19-9-2005
- This doesn't seem easy to do (dynamically anyway). - Lazarus 05:27, 11 November 2005 (CST)
- It can be done easily enough by adding a Category:Stubs to the Template:Stub. Changing the template should change all the pages with the template to be in the stubs category. - Malkin86 15:09, 3 February 2006 (EST)
- Time
- What's this business about some wiki creators signing their names on the bottom of articles?--Pwaryuex 00:43, 3 February 2006 (EST)
- You can easily throw a timestamp at the bottom of an article. It's probably there to recognise that it's an user's original work. I put one at the bottom of a study guide I posted. Can be found here. I think they're kinda appropriate for users who submit guides/essays/etc. as they provide both some recognition and accountability (for the end user) against plagiarism. --nwatts 14:09, 3 February 2006 (EST)
- I disagree with signing your name at the bottom though - what happens when someone comes a long and edits it (which they will, it's a wiki). And it looks messy. WW

